Artist M redivivus

General Materials

Rosado v. Wyman, 397 U.S. 397 (1970)
Rosado v Wyman.rtf

Wright v. City of Roanoke Redevelopment and Housing Authority, 479 U.S. 418 (1987)
Wright v City of Roanoke Redevelopment and Housing Authority.rtf

Wilder v. Virginia Hospital Association, 496 U.S. 498 (1990)
Wilder v Virginia Hosp Assn.rtf

Suter v. Artist M., 503 U.S. 347 (1992)
Suter v Artist M.rtf

Blessing v. Freestone, 520 U.S. 329 (1997)
Blessing v Freestone.rtf

Gonzaga University v. Doe, 536 U.S. 273 (2002)
Gonzaga University v Doe.rtf

Armstrong v. Exceptional Child Center, No. 14-15, 135 S.Ct. 1378 (March 31, 2015)
Armstrong v Exceptional Child Center Inc.rtf

42 U.S.C. sec. 1320a-2
42 U.S.C. sec. 1320a-2.docx

42 U.S.C. sec. 1320a-10
42 U.S.C. sec. 1320a-10.docx

LH, H. Conf. Rep. No. 103-761 (1994) at 926, reprinted in 1994 USCCAN 2901, 3257.

H.R. Rep. No. 102-631 (Ways & Means) at 364-67. Revenue Act of 1992; 1992 CIS H783-13, 5 fiches, page 1 (cover, fiche 1) plus pages 364-67 (fiche 4)
H.R. Rep. No. 102-631.docx
138 Cong. Rec. 34090 (Oct. 8, 1992) (Sen. Riegle)
138 Cong. Rec. 34090.pdf
139 Cong. Rec. 5571 introducing S. 620 (March 18, 1993) (Sen. Riegle)
139 Cong. Rec. 5571.pdf

Perkins, Pin the Tail on the Donkey, 9 St. Louis Univ. Journal of Health Law & Policy 207 (2016)

1902(a)(23) Cases

Dear State Medicaid Director 16-5, April 19, 2016

Dear State Medicaid Director 18-3, Jan. 19, 2018

Planned Parenthood of Greater Texas v. Smith, No. 1:15-cv-1058 (W.D. Tex.), on appeal, No. 17-50282 (5th Cir.)

PI opinion, 2/4/17
PPGT v Smith PI order 16942750-0–28141.pdf

Opening brief, 8/7/17
5C PPGT 17-50282 appellant’s brief.pdf

42 Members amicus, 8/14/17
5C PPGT 17-50282 42 MC amicus.pdf

Donovan amicus, 8/17/17
5C PPGT 17-50282 Donovan amicus.pdf

Eagle Forum amicus, 8/14/17
5C PPGT 17-50282 Eagle Forum amicus.pdf

Bryant amicus, 8/14/17
5C PPGT Bryant amicus.pdf

Appellees’ brief, 10/6/17
5C PPGT 17-50282 appellees’ brief.pdf

Black Mamas Matter amicus, 10/13/17
5C PPGT 17-50282 BMM amicus.pdf

NHeLP amicus, 10/13/17
28_17-50282_Brief of Amici Curiae NHeLP et al.filestampaccepted.pdf

25 Senators’ amicus, 10/13/17
5C PPGT 17-50282 US Sen amicus brief.pdf

Appellants’ reply brief, 11/17/17
5C PPGT 17-50282 reply brief.pdf

Planned Parenthood of Gulf Coast v. Gee, No. 3:15-cv-00565 (M.D. La.), on appeal, No. 17-30987 (5th Cir.)

Fifth Circuit opinion, 9/14/16

Fifth Circuit opinion 6/29/17

States’ amicus brief supporting rehearing en banc, 7/24/17
5C PPG states’ rhb amicus.pdf

PP letter re Does v. Gillespie additional authority, 8/21/17
5C PPGee 8C add auth response.pdf

Dissent from denial of rehearing en banc, 11/28/17
PP v. Gee RHB.pdf

Planned Parenthood of Indiana v. Commissioner, 699 F.3d 962 (7th Cir. 2012)

Planned Parenthood of Greater Ohio v. Hodges, 201 F.Supp.3d 898 (S.D. Ohio 2016)

Planned Parenthood of Arkansas & Eastern Oklahoma v. Gillespie, No. 4:15-cv-566 (E.D. Ark.), on appeal sub nom. Does v. Gillespie, No. 15-3271 (8th Cir.)

Opening brief, 12/1/15
8C PP appellant opening brief.pdf

Appellees’ brief, 1/29/16
8C PP appellee brief.pdf

Appellants’ reply brief, 2/26/16
8C PP appellant reply brief.pdf

Eighth Circuit opinion, 8/16/17
PPArk v GIllespie 8th cir opin.pdf

Petition for rehearing en banc, with exhibits, 8/30/17
8C PP pet rhr en banc.pdf
8C PP pet rhr ex 1.pdf
8C PP pet rhr ex 2.pdf
8C PP pet rhr ex 3.pdf

Opposition to petition for rehearing en banc, 10/24/17
Does v. Gillespie rehearing en banc op.pdf

Order denying rehearing en banc, 11/13/17
Does v. Gillespie order denying rehearing en banc.pdf

Planned Parenthood of Arizona v. Betlach, 727 F.3d 960 (9th Cir. 2013)

Planned Parenthood of Kansas v. Andersen, No. 16-3249 (10th Cir., Feb. 21, 2018)
10th cir PP opinion.pdf

Joint motion to stay the mandate, 3/5/18
Document 9.pdf