Transition 2024-2025

Project 2025: Department of Agriculture (Daren Bakst)

Project 2025: Department of Health and Human Services (Roger Severino)

Project 2025: Department of Justice (Gene Hamilton)

Project 2025: Department of Labor and Related Agencies (Jonathan Berry)

===

New York Times copy of Republican budget ideas, 1/23/2025

===

CRS, “Agency Nonacquiescence: An Overview of Constitutional and Practical Considerations” (2023)

HOUSE REPORT (WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE) NO. 98-618, MAR. 14, 1984, reprinted in 1984 U.S. Code Cong. & Ad. News 3059-63.

===

Garland v. Texas Top Cop Shop, No. 24A653 (filed December 31, 2024)

Jan 03 2025Response to application (24A653) requested by Justice Alito, due by 4 p.m. (EST) on January 10, 2025.

===

American Public Health Ass’n v. Office of Management and Budget, No. 1:25-cv- (D. D.C., filed Jan. 20, 2025)

Complaint

===

Alliance for Retired Americans v. Bessent, No. 1:25-cv-313 (D. D.C., filed Feb. 3, 2025)

Complaint (and errata filed 2/4)

Motion for TRO, February 5, 2025

Scheduling order, February 5, 2025

02/05/2025 MINUTE ORDER: The Court will provide access for the public to telephonically attend the scheduling hearing on Plaintiffs’ 8 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order, set for February 5, 2025 at 3:00 PM ET. The hearing can be accessed by dialing the toll-free number: (833) 990-9400 (Meeting ID: 585620654). Attendees using the public access telephone line can listen to proceedings but cannot speak during the hearing. Attendees are also reminded of the general prohibition against photographing, recording, or rebroadcasting any court proceedings (including those held by telephone or videoconference). Violation of these prohibitions may result in sanctions, including removal of court-issued media credentials, restricted entry to future hearings, denial of entry to future hearings, or any other sanctions deemed necessary by the Court. Signed by Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly on 2/5/2025. (lcckk3) (Entered: 02/05/2025)
02/05/2025 MINUTE ORDER: The Court held a scheduling hearing on Plaintiffs’ 8 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order. The Court adjourned that scheduling hearing to allow the parties to confer. The parties shall reconvene via teleconference to continue the scheduling hearing at 6:00 PM ET this evening, February 5, 2025.The Court will again provide access for the public to telephonically attend the scheduling hearing. The hearing can be accessed by dialing the toll-free number: (833) 990-9400 (Meeting ID: 585620654). Attendees using the public access telephone line can listen to proceedings but cannot speak during the hearing. Attendees are also reminded of the general prohibition against photographing, recording, or rebroadcasting any court proceedings (including those held by telephone or videoconference). Violation of these prohibitions may result in sanctions, including removal of court-issued media credentials, restricted entry to future hearings, denial of entry to future hearings, or any other sanctions deemed necessary by the Court. Signed by Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly on 2/5/2025. (lcckk3) (Entered: 02/05/2025)
02/05/2025 MINUTE ORDER: The Court held a scheduling hearing on Plaintiffs’ 8 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order. Following initial discussions, the Court sent the parties a proposed order that would defer ruling on the Motion and order Defendants to take steps to preserve the status quo with respect to access to systems of records maintained by Defendant Bureau of the Fiscal Service. The Court recessed, and the parties each submitted their own proposed edits to the Court’s proposed order. The Court then reconvened the parties and discussed their proposals. Although the parties appear to agree in principle, there are a few lingering disputes. And the parties require additional time to meet and confer. With that in mind, the Court proposed two possible tracks for moving forward with this litigation. Track One: The parties confer and agree to the terms of a proposed consent order to the preserve the status quo. The parties promptly file a consent motion to enter that order, with the terms of their agreement attached as a proposed order. Plaintiffs convert the 8 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order into a motion for a preliminary injunction. Defendants respond to that motion on or before February 12, 2025. Plaintiffs reply on or before February 18, 2025. And the Court holds a motion hearing at 2:00 PM ET on February 24, 2025 in Courtroom 28A. Track Two: The parties confer and are unable to reach an agreement on the terms of a proposed consent order to preserve the status quo. Defendants file their opposition to the 8 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order by 12:00 PM ET on February 6, 2025. Plaintiffs file their reply by 4:00 PM ET on February 6, 2025. And the Court holds a motion hearing at 3:30 PM ET on February 7, 2025 in Courtroom 28A. The Court ORDERS that the parties confer regarding these two tracks. If the parties reach an agreement to follow Track One, the Court ORDERS that the parties shall file their consent motion no later than 11:30 AM ET, tomorrow February 6 and adhere to the deadlines described above in Track One. If no such motion is filed by 11:30 AM ET, the Court ORDERS that the parties shall adhere to the deadlines described above in Track Two. The parties may contact Chambers by email as necessary in advance of these deadlines. Signed by Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly on 2/5/2025. (lcckk3) (Entered: 02/05/2025)

US unopposed motion for entry of order, February 5, 2025

02/05/2025 NOTICE of Provisional/Government Not Certified Status re 11 Joint MOTION for Entry of Proposed Order by SCOTT BESSENT, DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, BUREAU OF THE FISCAL SERVICE. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Humphreys, Bradley) Modified event on 2/6/2025 (znmw)..Your attorney renewal/government certification has not been received. As a result, your membership with the U.S. District & Bankruptcy Courts for the District of Columbia is not in good standing, and you are not permitted to file. Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 83.9, you must immediately correct your membership status by following the appropriate instructions on this page of our website: https://www.dcd.uscourts.gov/attorney-renewal. Please be advised that the presiding judge in this case has been notified that you are currently not in good standing to file in this court. Renewal Due by 2/12/2025. (zhcn) (Entered: 02/06/2025)
02/05/2025 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly: Scheduling Conference held on 2/5/2025 on Plaintiffs’ 8 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order. See Order for details. (Court Reporter Lisa Edwards.) (zdot) (Entered: 02/06/2025)
02/06/2025 RESOLVED…..NOTICE of Provisional/Government Not Certified Status re 11 Joint MOTION for Entry of Proposed Order by SCOTT BESSENT, DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, BUREAU OF THE FISCAL SERVICE. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Humphreys, Bradley).Your attorney renewal/government certification has not been received. As a result, your membership with the U.S. District & Bankruptcy Courts for the District of Columbia is not in good standing, and you are not permitted to file. Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 83.9, you must immediately correct your membership status by following the appropriate instructions on this page of our website: https://www.dcd.uscourts.gov/attorney-renewal. Please be advised that the presiding judge in this case has been notified that you are currently not in good standing to file in this court. Renewal Due by 2/13/2025. (zapb) Modified on 2/6/2025 (zhcn). (Entered: 02/06/2025)

Joint motion for entry of order (filed by plaintiffs), February 6, 2025

Order, February 6, 2025

Former Treasury Officials amicus, February 11, 2025

American Center for Law and Justice amicus, February 11, 2025

US TRO/PI opposition, February 12, 2025

Order, February 18, 2025

Plaintiffs’ reply supporting preliminary injunction, February 18, 2025

Defendants’ supplemental brief, February 19, 2025

Plaintiffs’ supplemental brief, February 20, 2025

[]

02/24/2025 MINUTE ORDER: The Court will hold a hearing on Plaintiffs’ 8 Motion for Preliminary Injunction in Courtroom 28A at 2:00 PM ET this afternoon, February 24, 2025. Members of the public can access the hearing telephonically by dialing the toll-free number: (833) 990-9400 (Meeting ID: 585620654). Attendees using the public access telephone line can listen to proceedings but cannot speak during the hearing. Attendees are also reminded of the general prohibition against photographing, recording, or rebroadcasting any court proceedings (including those held by telephone or videoconference). Violation of these prohibitions may result in sanctions, including removal of court-issued media credentials, restricted entry to future hearings, denial of entry to future hearings, or any other sanctions deemed necessary by the Court. Signed by Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly on 2/24/2025. (lcckk3) (Entered: 02/24/2025)

[Hearing, 2/24

02/24/2025 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly: Motion Hearing held on 2/24/2025 re 8 Plaintiff’s MOTION for Preliminary Injunction; heard and taken under advisement. (Court Reporter Chandra Kean.) (zdot) (Entered: 02/24/2025)

[

===

State of New York v. Trump, No. 1:25-cv-1144 (S.D. N.Y., filed Feb. 7, 2025)

Complaint

Proposed TRO, February 7, 2025

Memo supporting TRO, February 7, 2025

Declaration re notice, February 7, 2025

TRO and order to show cause, February 8, 2025

Complaint (corrected?), February 8, 2025

===

Massachusetts v [], No. 1:25-cv-10338 (D. Mass., filed Feb. 10, 2025)

Complaint

Memo supporting ex parte TRO, with exhibits, February 10, 2025

[]

[]

TRO, February 10, 2025

======

Letter to Congress, February 12, 2025

===

Sassoon to Bondi, February 12, 2025

Bove to Sassoon, February 13, 2025

======

New Mexico v. Musk, No. 1:25-cv-429 (D. D.C., filed Feb. 13, 2025)

Complaint

===

Erwin Griswold, Government in Ignorance of the Law — A Plea for Better Publication of Executive Legislation, 48 Harvard Law Review 198 (1934)

THE OFFICE OF THE FEDERAL REGISTER
A Brief History Commemorating the 70th Anniversary
of the Publication of the First Issue of the Federal Register
MARCH 14, 1936

===

Bessent v. Dellinger, No. 24A790

Feb 18 2025Response to application (24A790) requested by The Chief Justice, due by 2pm (EST) on February 19, 2025.

==

Washington v. Trump

Ninth Circuit order, February 19, 2025

===

Letter from Harris to Grassley, 2/20/25

Philadelphia

[]

Memorandum opinion and preliminary injunction, February 24, 2025

===

Global Health Council v. Trump, No. 1:25-cv-400 (D. D.C., filed Feb. 11, 2025)

Complaint

Motion for TRO, February 11, 2025

Application, No. 24A831, February 26, 2025

Feb 26 2025Order issued by The Chief Justice: Upon consideration of the application of counsel for the applicants, it is ordered that the February 25, 2025 orders of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, case Nos. 1:25-cv-00400 and 1:25-cv-00402, are hereby stayed pending further order of the undersigned or of the Court. It is further ordered that any response to the application be filed on or before Friday, February 28, 2025, by 12 p.m. (EST).

Letter enclosing D.C. Circuit order

Response, February 28, 2025

Bates amicus, February 28, 2025

===

Arthur Earl Bonfield, Public Participation in Federal Rulemaking Relating to Public Property, Loans, Grants, Benefits, or Contracts, 118 U. Penn. Law Review 540 (1970)

Office of the Secretary [of HEW], Public Participation in Rule Making: Statement of Policy, 36 Fed. Reg. 2652 (Feb. 5, 1971)

Roger C. Cramton, The Why, Where and How of Broadened Public Participation in the Administrative Process, 60 Georgetown Law Journal 525 (1972)

HHS, Policy on Adhering to the Text of the Administrative Procedure Act, 90 Fed. Reg. 11029 (March 3, 2025)

===

New York v. McMahon, No. 1:25-cv-10601 (D. Mass., filed March 13, 2025)

Complaint

===

Carter v. U.S. Dept of Education, No. 1:25-cv-744 (D. D.C., filed March 14, 2025)

Complaint

===

AFSCME v. SSA, No. 1:25-cv-596 (D. Md., filed March 7, 2025)

Complaint

[]

Motion/memo for TRO and preliminary injunction and 705 order, March 7, 2025

US opposition, March 12, 2025

Plaintiffs’ reply, March 13, 2025

[Hearing, 3/14]

Memorandum order, and TRO, March 20, 2025

Letter to counsel, March 21, 2025

Letter to counsel, March 21, 2025

[]

Fourth Circuit # 25-1291

[]

US motion for stay, March 26, 2025

Fourth Circuit order requesting response, March 27, 2025

Supplemental US declarations re compliance, March 27, 2025

Letter to counsel re stay, March 27, 2025

Supplemental Dudek declaration, March 28, 2025

Plaintiffs’ opposition to stay, March 28, 2025

US reply supporting stay, March 31, 2025

Order dismissing appeal, April 1, 2025

[]

Letter order denying reconsideration and stay, April 11, 2025

US opposition to expanding scope, April 14, 2025

Order, April 14, 2025

[]

Third Flick declaration, April 14, 2025

Order declining to expand scope of 4/15 hearing, April 14, 2025

US notice that it will stand on record, April 14, 2025

04/15/2025139 Preliminary Injunction Hearing held on 4/15/2025 before Judge Ellen Lipton Hollander.(Court Reporter: Nadine Bachmann) (dg4s, Deputy Clerk) (Entered: 04/15/2025)

Plaintiffs’ supplemental authority (2006 Canadian softwood agreement), April 15, 2025

[]

Parties’ report re protective order, April 16, 2025

Order, April 17, 2025

Memorandum opinion, April 17, 2025

Order, April 17, 2025

Notice of appeal, April 17, 2025

US motion for stay, April 17, 2025

Plaintiffs’ opposition to stay, April 19, 2025

Fourth Circuit # 25-1411

US motion for administrative stay, April 18, 2025

Request for response, April 18, 2025

Plaintiffs’ motion for extension to respond, April 18, 2025

Order extending response time to 4/23, April 19, 2025

District court order denying stay, April 22, 2025

US letter re district court decision, April 23, 2025

Plaintiffs’ opposition to stay, April 23, 2025

US reply, April 24, 2025

Amended preliminary injunction opinion, April 24, 2025

En banc/denial of stay order, April 30, 2025

Fourth Circuit briefing schedule, April 30, 2025

No. 24A1063

Application, May 2, 2025

May 02 2025Response to application (24A1063) requested by The Chief Justice, due by 4 p.m. (EDT) on May 12, 2025.

Response, May 12, 2025

May 13 2025Amicus brief of Veterans and Labor Unions submitted.
Main DocumentProof of Service
May 13 2025Reply of Social Security Administration, et al. in support of application submitted.
ReplyProof of Service

Veterans and Labor Unions amicus, May 13, 2025

US reply, May 13, 2025

Order, June 6, 2025

US Fourth Circuit brief, June 9, 2025

===

[]

Order, March 20, 2025

===

Perkins Coie v. [], No. 1:25-cv-716

[]

Briefing schedule, March 14, 2025

03/19/2025 MINUTE ORDER (paperless), upon consideration of plaintiff’s 30 Motion to Clarify Temporary Restraining Order, which appropriately raises promptly a difference of interpretation of the Court’s 21 Injunction Order for clarification to ensure full compliance with the obligations imposed, ISSUING the following ORDER regarding defendants’ obligations under the Court’s 21 Injunction Order expressly directing (1) defendants to “communicate to every recipient of a request for disclosure of any relationship with Perkins Coie LLP or any person associated with the firm…” that “such request is rescinded,” id. at 2 (emphasis supplied), regardless of which agency subject to Executive Order 14230 made the request, and (2) four of the named defendants, namely, U.S. Department of Justice; U.S. Attorney General Pamela Bondi; the Office of Management and Budget (“OMB”); and OMB Director Russell Vought, to “immediately issue guidance to all other agencies subject to Executive Order 14230 to suspend and rescind any implementation or enforcement” of the enjoined portions of the Executive Order, id. (emphasis supplied):

(1) DIRECTING defendants U.S. Department of Justice; Pamela Bondi, in her official capacity as U.S. Attorney General; the Office of Management and Budget; and Russell Vought, in his official capacity as Director of the Office of Management and Budget, to immediately issue guidance to all other agencies subject to Executive Order 14230 directing them immediately to (a) communicate to every recipient of a request for disclosure of any relationship with Perkins Coie LLP or any person associated with the firm, made pursuant to Section 3(a) of Executive Order 14230, that such request is rescinded until further order of this Court; and (b) cease making such requests for disclosure, pursuant to Section 3(a) of Executive Order 14230, until further order of the Court; and

(2) FURTHER DIRECTING defendants to file, by 12:00 PM on March 20, 2025, a status report describing the steps taken to ensure compliance with this Order and certifying compliance with its requirements, in light of the fact that “some agencies have requested that contractors respond to disclosure requests as soon as Thursday, March 20, 2025.” Plaintiff’s 30 Motion ¶ 10.

Signed by Judge Beryl A. Howell on March 19, 2025. (lcbah2) (Entered: 03/19/2025)

US status report, March 20, 2025

US supplemental status report, March 20, 2025

US motion to disqualify Judge Howell in 1:25-cv-716, March 21, 2025

===

Opinion denying stay, March 26, 2025

[]

Apr 07 2025Application (24A949) to vacate injunction entered by the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, submitted to The Chief Justice.
Main DocumentProof of Service
Apr 07 2025Letter of applicant Kristi Noem, Secretary of Homeland Security, et al. filed.
Main Document
Apr 07 2025Order entered by The Chief Justice: Upon consideration of the application of counsel for the applicants, it is ordered that the April 4, 2025 order of the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, case No. 8:25-cv-951, is hereby stayed pending further order of The Chief Justice or of the Court. It is further ordered that a response to the application be filed on or before Tuesday, April 8th, 2025, by 5 p.m. (EDT).
Apr 07 2025Response of Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia, et al. to application submitted.
Main DocumentProof of Service
Apr 07 2025Amicus brief of Professors Erwin Chemerinsky, Martha Minow, and Laurence Tribe submitted.
Main DocumentProof of Service
Apr 08 2025Reply of Kristi Noem, Secretary of Homeland Security, et al. in support of application submitted.
ReplyProof of Service
Apr 08 2025Notice of Supplemental Authorities of Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia, et al. submitted.
Main DocumentProof of Service
Apr 09 2025Motion For Leave to File Sur-Reply of Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia, et al. submitted.
Main DocumentProof of Service

[]

Order re criminal contempt, April 16, 2025

==

J.A.V. v. Trump, No. 1:25-cv-72 (S.D. Texas, filed 4/9/25)

[]

TRO, April 9, 2025

TRO and scheduling order, April 11, 2025

Page length order, April 16, 2025

===

HHS, the defendant

State of New York v. Kennedy, No. 1:25-cv-196 (D. R.I., filed 5/5/25)

Complaint

Motion for preliminary injunction, and declarations, May 9, 2025

05/12/2025 TEXT ORDER entering expedited briefing schedule re 43 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction. Defendants’ Response due by midnight on Friday May 16, 2025 and Plaintiffs’ Reply, if any, due by 5:00 PM on May 19, 2025. Plaintiffs are to notify Defendants of the expedited schedule. So Ordered by District Judge Melissa R. DuBose on 5/12/2025. (Urizandi, Nissheneyra) (Entered: 05/12/2025)

===

Scotusblog chart, May 13, 2025

Pending applications (8)

DocketCase PageIssue(s)
24a1079Noem v. DoeWhether the Supreme Court should stay the district court’s order holding that the Secretary of Homeland Security lacked authority to revoke the categorical grant of parole to 532,000 non-citizens from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua, and Venezuela, without providing individualized, case-by-case consideration for each person.
24a1077Ritchie v. IndianaWhether the Supreme Court should stay the execution of Benjamin Ritchie.
24a1063Social Security Administration v. American Federation of State, County, and Municipal EmployeesWhether the Supreme Court should stay the district court’s injunction blocking Department of Government Efficiency team members and affiliates from access Social Security Administration record systems.
24a1059Noem v. National TPS AllianceWhether the Supreme Court should stay the district court’s order barring the Secretary of Homeland Security from terminating a portion of the Temporary Protected Status designations for Venezuelan nationals.
24a1051Libby v. FecteauWhether the Supreme Court should grant an injunction to restore Maine State Representative Laurel Libby’s right to vote in the Maine House after she was censured for a social media post criticizing the state’s policy of allowing transgender athletes to participate in girls sports.
24a1007A.A.R.P. v. TrumpWhether the Supreme Court should stay the removal of a proposed class of Venezuelan men in immigration custody and preserve the status quo for individuals challenging their removal under the Alien Enemies Act in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas.
24a966Trump v. WilcoxWhether the Supreme Court should stay the district court’s orders reinstating Gwynne Wilcox and Cathy Harris to the National Labor Relations Board and Merit Systems Protection Board.
24a884Trump v. CASAWhether the Supreme Court should stay the district courts’ nationwide preliminary injunctions on the Trump administration’s Jan. 20 executive order ending birthright citizenship except as to the individual plaintiffs and identified members of the organizational plaintiffs or states.

a.a.r.p.

Apr 19 2025Response to application from respondents Donald J. Trump, et al. filed.
Main DocumentOtherProof of Service
Apr 21 2025Reply of applicants A.A.R.P., et al. filed.
ReplyReplyProof of Service
Apr 23 2025Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Appendix Under Seal filed by applicant A.A.R.P., et al.
Main Document
May 11 2025Notice of District Court Decision of A.A.R.P., et al. submitted.
Main DocumentOther
May 12 2025Supplemental Memorandum Regarding Emergency Application of Donald J. Trump, et al. submitted.
Main DocumentProof of Service

Libby, No. 24A1051 (May 20, 2025)

budget

[]

Congressional Record version, H2235-H2334 (May 21, 2025)

Engrossed in House, May 22, 2025

Revisions, passed House 6/11

Senate Finance text, 6/17

===

SNAP e-mail

===

Harvard v. Noem, 1:25-cv-11472 (D. Mass., filed 5/23/2025)

Complaint

Memorandum supporting TRO motion, May 23, 2025

TRO, May 23, 2025

===

US v Texas, 7:25-cv-55 (N.D. Tex., filed 6/4/2025)

Complaint

Joint motion for entry, June 4, 2025

Order and judgment, June 4, 2025

===

“Barbara” v. Trump, 1:25-cv-244 (D. N.H., filed June 27, 2025)

[]

[]

Class certification memo, June 27, 2025

Preliminary injunction memo, June 27, 2025

US objections (both motions), July 3, 2025

Plaintiffs’ reply, July 7, 2025

Class certification order, July 10, 2025

https://affordablecareactlitigation.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/barbara-class-7-10-25.pdf

Preliminary injunction order, July 10, 2025

Opinion, July 10, 2025

===

New York v. [], No. 1:25-cv-345 (D. R.I., filed July 21, 2025)

[]

Motion for preliminary injunction, July 21, 2025

US preliminary injunction opposition, August 11, 2025

Reply supporting preliminary injunction, August 18, 2025

FAIR amicus, August 19/21, 2025

[]