General Materials
Rosado v. Wyman, 397 U.S. 397 (1970)
Rosado v Wyman-1
Wright v. City of Roanoke Redevelopment and Housing Authority, 479 U.S. 418 (1987)
Wright v City of Roanoke Redevelopment and Housing Authority
Wilder v. Virginia Hospital Association, 496 U.S. 498 (1990)
Wilder v Virginia Hosp Assn
Suter v. Artist M., 503 U.S. 347 (1992)
Suter v Artist M
Blessing v. Freestone, 520 U.S. 329 (1997)
Blessing v Freestone
Gonzaga University v. Doe, 536 U.S. 273 (2002)
Gonzaga University v Doe
Sanchez v. Johnson, 416 F.3d 1051 (9th Cir. 2005)
SANCHEZ v JOHNSON
Armstrong v. Exceptional Child Center, No. 14-15, transcript of oral argument (January 20, 2015)
14-15oat
Armstrong v. Exceptional Child Center, No. 14-15, 135 S.Ct. 1378 (March 31, 2015)
Armstrong v Exceptional Child Center Inc
42 U.S.C. sec. 1320a-2
42 U.S.C. sec. 1320a-2
42 U.S.C. sec. 1320a-10
42 U.S.C. sec. 1320a-10
LH:
LH, H. Conf. Rep. No. 103-761 (1994) at 926, reprinted in 1994 USCCAN 2901, 3257.
multiethnic placement
H.R. Rep. No. 102-631 (Ways & Means) at 364-67. Revenue Act of 1992; 1992 CIS H783-13, 5 fiches, page 1 (cover, fiche 1) plus pages 364-67 (fiche 4)
H.R. Rep. No. 102-631
138 Cong. Rec. 34090 (Oct. 8, 1992) (Sen. Riegle)
138 Cong. Rec. 34090
139 Cong. Rec. 5571 introducing S. 620 (March 18, 1993) (Sen. Riegle)
139 Cong. Rec. 5571
Cover, Federal Judicial Review of State Welfare Practices, 67 Columbia L. Rev. 84 (1967)
Federal Judicial Review of State Welfare Practices-1
NWRO v. Finch, 429 F.2d 725 (D.C. Cir. 1970)
The National Welfare Rights Organization et al
Arizona DPW v. HEW, 449 F.2d 456 (9th Cir. 1971)
Arizona State Dept of Public Welfare v Department of Health Ed and Welfare.rtf
Arizona State Dept of Public Welfare v Department of Health Ed and Welfare-1
Almenares v. Wyman, 453 F.2d 1075 (2d Cir. 1971)
Almenares v Wyman-1
Perkins, Pin the Tail on the Donkey, 9 St. Louis Univ. Journal of Health Law & Policy 207 (2016)
jane_perkins-article-1-1
CMS, “Medicaid Program; Methods for Assuring Access to Covered Medicaid Services—Exemptions for States With High Managed Care Penetration Rates and Rate Reduction Threshold,” 83 Fed. Reg. 12696 (March 23, 2018).
2018-05898
1902(a)(23) Cases
Dear State Medicaid Director 16-5, April 19, 2016
smd16005
Dear State Medicaid Director 18-3, Jan. 19, 2018
smd18003
FOURTH CIRCUIT
Planned Parenthood South Atlantic v. Baker, No. 3:18-cv-2078 (D. S.C.), 326 F.Supp.3d 39 (August 28, 2018)
Appeal, No. 18-2133
Appellant’s opening brief, 11/26/2018
4C PPSA v. Baker appellant’s opening brief
Appellees’ brief, 1/14/2019
Reproductive rights organizations amicus, 1/22/2019
4c reproductive rights orgzs amicus
NHeLP amicus, 1/22/2019
Appellant’s opposition to amicus filings, 2/4/2019
4C opposition to amicus filings
Appellant’s reply brief, 2/4/2019
Order accepting amicus filings, 2/6/2019
4C order accepting amicus briefs
FIFTH CIRCUIT
Planned Parenthood of Greater Texas v. Smith, No. 1:15-cv-1058 (W.D. Tex.), on appeal, No. 17-50282 (5th Cir.)
PI opinion, 2/4/17
PPGT v Smith PI order 16942750-0–28141
Opening brief, 8/7/17
5C PPGT 17-50282 appellant’s brief
42 Members amicus, 8/14/17
5C PPGT 17-50282 42 MC amicus
Donovan amicus, 8/17/17
5C PPGT 17-50282 Donovan amicus
Eagle Forum amicus, 8/14/17
5C PPGT 17-50282 Eagle Forum amicus
Bryant amicus, 8/14/17
5C PPGT Bryant amicus
Appellees’ brief, 10/6/17
5C PPGT 17-50282 appellees’ brief
Black Mamas Matter amicus, 10/13/17
5C PPGT 17-50282 BMM amicus
NHeLP amicus, 10/13/17
28_17-50282_Brief of Amici Curiae NHeLP et al.filestampaccepted
25 Senators’ amicus, 10/13/17
5C PPGT 17-50282 US Sen amicus brief
Appellants’ reply brief, 11/17/17
5C PPGT 17-50282 reply brief
Opinion, 1/17/19
Texas petition for rehearing en banc, 1/31/19
5C PP v. Smith Tex petition for rehearing en banc
Texas Fifth Circuit motion to vacate District Court injunction, February 1, 2019
Fifth Circuit en banc and scheduling order, February 4, 2019
5C order for rehearing en banc
Fifth Circuit Planned Parenthood op to stay, February 4, 2019
5C PP v. Smith op to motion to stay
Fifth Circuit order directing reply re motion to vacate, February 5, 2019
5C PP v. Smith order directing reply
Fifth Circuit order denying petition for rehearing en banc as moot, February 5, 2019
5C PP v. Smith order denying petition rheb as moot
Appellants’ reply supporting motion to vacate, February 7, 2019
5C PP v. Smith reply supporting motion to vacate
Order transferring motion to vacate to en banc review, February 15, 2019
5C order carrying motion to stay dc injunction with case
Planned Parenthood of Gulf Coast v. Gee, No. 3:15-cv-00565 (M.D. La.), on appeal, No. 17-30987 (5th Cir.), No. 17-1492
Fifth Circuit opinion, 9/14/16
15-30987-2016-09-14
Fifth Circuit opinion 6/29/17
15-30987-2016-09-14
States’ amicus brief supporting rehearing en banc, 7/24/17
5C PPG states’ rhb amicus
PP letter re Does v. Gillespie additional authority, 8/21/17
5C PPGee 8C add auth response
Dissent from denial of rehearing en banc, 11/28/17
PP v. Gee RHB
Cert extension request, 1/30/18
20180130181422949_DHH – PPGC DRAFT Cert Extension Motion
Supreme Court order extending time for filing for cert, 2/6/18
PP v Gee cert extension
Cert petition, 4/27/18
20180427135540119_Gee v Planned Parenthood_cert. petition_PDF-a
Amicus, 27 family organizations, 5/31/18
20180531124951132_17-1492 Amicus Brief of Twenty-Seven Family Policy Organizations
Amicus, 90 members of Congress, 5/31/18
20180531140245033_17-1492 Amcus BrIef of 90 Members of Congress
Amicus, Indiana, 5/31/18
20180531152126434_Brief of Indiana et. al. as Amici Curiae in Support of Petitioner
Amicus, ACLJ, 5/31/18
20180531164747384_Gee v PPGC Amicus ACLJ
Cert opposition, 7/2/2018
20180702130527612_Gee v. Planned Parenthood Brief in Opposition
Cert reply, 8/2/2018
20180802114632261_Gee v Planned Parenthood reply brief_pdfA
Cert denied, 12/10/2018
SIXTH CIRCUIT
See Planned Parenthood of Greater Ohio v. Hodges, 201 F.Supp.3d 898 (S.D. Ohio 2016), aff’d sub nom Planned Parenthood of Greater Ohio v. Himes, _ F.3d _,
2018 WL 1833196 (6th Cir., April 18, 2018)
SEVENTH CIRCUIT
Planned Parenthood of Indiana v. Commissioner, 699 F.3d 962 (7th Cir. 2012)
EIGHTH CIRCUIT
Planned Parenthood of Arkansas & Eastern Oklahoma v. Gillespie, No. 4:15-cv-566 (E.D. Ark.), on appeal sub nom. Does v. Gillespie, No. 15-3271 (8th Cir.)
Opening brief, 12/1/15
8C PP appellant opening brief
Appellees’ brief, 1/29/16
8C PP appellee brief
Appellants’ reply brief, 2/26/16
8C PP appellant reply brief
Eighth Circuit opinion, 8/16/17
PPArk v GIllespie 8th cir opin
Petition for rehearing en banc, with exhibits, 8/30/17
8C PP pet rhr en banc
Opposition to petition for rehearing en banc, 10/24/17
Does v. Gillespie rehearing en banc op
Order denying rehearing en banc, 11/13/17
Does v. Gillespie order denying rehearing en banc
NINTH CIRCUIT
Planned Parenthood of Arizona v. Betlach, 727 F.3d 960 (9th Cir. 2013)
TENTH CIRCUIT
Planned Parenthood of Kansas v. Andersen, No. 16-3249 (10th Cir., Feb. 21, 2018), No. 17-1340
10th cir PP opinion
Joint motion to stay the mandate, 3/5/18
Document 9
Petition for certiorari, 3/21/18
20180321141128195_Andersen v. Planned Parenthood of Kansas et al._Petition
Request for extension of time to file response, 4/16/18
20180416145157114_Andersen – Request for Ext.
Americans United for Life cert-stage amicus, 4/23/18
20180423103023537_17-1340 Amicus Brief of American United for Life
Indiana et al cert-stage amicus, 4/23/18
20180423105359150_Brief of Indiana et al. as Amici Curiae in Support of Petitioner
Request for further extension, 5/16/18
20180516132705581_Anderson – Second Letter Request for Extension of Time
Opposition to further extension, 5/16/18
20180516163614026_Kansas Letter re extension
May 22 2018 Motion to further extend the time to file a response denied.
Certiorari opposition, 5/23/18
20180523164304452_17-1340 Brief in Opposition
Certiorari reply, 6/1/18
20180601103631521_17-1340 rb
Certiorari denial, 12/10/18
