Artist M redivivus

General Materials

Rosado v. Wyman, 397 U.S. 397 (1970)
Rosado v Wyman-1

Wright v. City of Roanoke Redevelopment and Housing Authority, 479 U.S. 418 (1987)
Wright v City of Roanoke Redevelopment and Housing Authority

Wilder v. Virginia Hospital Association, 496 U.S. 498 (1990)
Wilder v Virginia Hosp Assn

Suter v. Artist M., 503 U.S. 347 (1992)
Suter v Artist M

Blessing v. Freestone, 520 U.S. 329 (1997)
Blessing v Freestone

Gonzaga University v. Doe, 536 U.S. 273 (2002)
Gonzaga University v Doe

Sanchez v. Johnson, 416 F.3d 1051 (9th Cir. 2005)
SANCHEZ v JOHNSON

Armstrong v. Exceptional Child Center, No. 14-15, transcript of oral argument (January 20, 2015)
14-15oat

Armstrong v. Exceptional Child Center, No. 14-15, 135 S.Ct. 1378 (March 31, 2015)
Armstrong v Exceptional Child Center Inc

42 U.S.C. sec. 1320a-2
42 U.S.C. sec. 1320a-2

42 U.S.C. sec. 1320a-10
42 U.S.C. sec. 1320a-10

LH:
LH, H. Conf. Rep. No. 103-761 (1994) at 926, reprinted in 1994 USCCAN 2901, 3257.
multiethnic placement

H.R. Rep. No. 102-631 (Ways & Means) at 364-67. Revenue Act of 1992; 1992 CIS H783-13, 5 fiches, page 1 (cover, fiche 1) plus pages 364-67 (fiche 4)
H.R. Rep. No. 102-631

138 Cong. Rec. 34090 (Oct. 8, 1992) (Sen. Riegle)
138 Cong. Rec. 34090

139 Cong. Rec. 5571 introducing S. 620 (March 18, 1993) (Sen. Riegle)
139 Cong. Rec. 5571

Cover, Federal Judicial Review of State Welfare Practices, 67 Columbia L. Rev. 84 (1967)
Federal Judicial Review of State Welfare Practices-1

NWRO v. Finch, 429 F.2d 725 (D.C. Cir. 1970)
The National Welfare Rights Organization et al

Arizona DPW v. HEW, 449 F.2d 456 (9th Cir. 1971)
Arizona State Dept of Public Welfare v Department of Health Ed and Welfare.rtf
Arizona State Dept of Public Welfare v Department of Health Ed and Welfare-1

Almenares v. Wyman, 453 F.2d 1075 (2d Cir. 1971)
Almenares v Wyman-1

Perkins, Pin the Tail on the Donkey, 9 St. Louis Univ. Journal of Health Law & Policy 207 (2016)
jane_perkins-article-1-1

CMS, “Medicaid Program; Methods for Assuring Access to Covered Medicaid Services—Exemptions for States With High Managed Care Penetration Rates and Rate Reduction Threshold,” 83 Fed. Reg. 12696 (March 23, 2018).
2018-05898

1902(a)(23) Cases

Dear State Medicaid Director 16-5, April 19, 2016
smd16005

Dear State Medicaid Director 18-3, Jan. 19, 2018
smd18003

FOURTH CIRCUIT

Planned Parenthood South Atlantic v. Baker, No. 3:18-cv-2078 (D. S.C.), 326 F.Supp.3d 39 (August 28, 2018)

PPSA v. Baker PI

Appeal, No. 18-2133

Appellant’s opening brief, 11/26/2018

4C PPSA v. Baker appellant’s opening brief

Appellees’ brief, 1/14/2019

4c pp appellees’ brief

Reproductive rights organizations amicus, 1/22/2019

4c reproductive rights orgzs amicus

NHeLP amicus, 1/22/2019

4c nhelp amicus

Appellant’s opposition to amicus filings, 2/4/2019

4C opposition to amicus filings

Appellant’s reply brief, 2/4/2019

4C reply brief

Order accepting amicus filings, 2/6/2019

4C order accepting amicus briefs

 

FIFTH CIRCUIT

Planned Parenthood of Greater Texas v. Smith, No. 1:15-cv-1058 (W.D. Tex.), on appeal, No. 17-50282 (5th Cir.)

PI opinion, 2/4/17
PPGT v Smith PI order 16942750-0–28141

Opening brief, 8/7/17
5C PPGT 17-50282 appellant’s brief

42 Members amicus, 8/14/17
5C PPGT 17-50282 42 MC amicus

Donovan amicus, 8/17/17
5C PPGT 17-50282 Donovan amicus

Eagle Forum amicus, 8/14/17
5C PPGT 17-50282 Eagle Forum amicus

Bryant amicus, 8/14/17
5C PPGT Bryant amicus

Appellees’ brief, 10/6/17
5C PPGT 17-50282 appellees’ brief

Black Mamas Matter amicus, 10/13/17
5C PPGT 17-50282 BMM amicus

NHeLP amicus, 10/13/17
28_17-50282_Brief of Amici Curiae NHeLP et al.filestampaccepted

25 Senators’ amicus, 10/13/17
5C PPGT 17-50282 US Sen amicus brief

Appellants’ reply brief, 11/17/17
5C PPGT 17-50282 reply brief

Opinion, 1/17/19

17-50282-cv0-1

Texas petition for rehearing en banc, 1/31/19

5C PP v. Smith Tex petition for rehearing en banc

Texas Fifth Circuit motion to vacate District Court injunction, February 1, 2019

merged_29998_-1-1549073047

Fifth Circuit en banc and scheduling order, February 4, 2019

5C order for rehearing en banc

Fifth Circuit Planned Parenthood op to stay, February 4, 2019

5C PP v. Smith op to motion to stay

Fifth Circuit order directing reply re motion to vacate, February 5, 2019

5C PP v. Smith order directing reply

Fifth Circuit order denying petition for rehearing en banc as moot, February 5, 2019

5C PP v. Smith order denying petition rheb as moot

Appellants’ reply supporting motion to vacate, February 7, 2019

5C PP v. Smith reply supporting motion to vacate

Order transferring motion to vacate to en banc review, February 15, 2019

5C order carrying motion to stay dc injunction with case

Appellants’ en banc brief, March 7, 2019

5C PP v. Smith appellants’ en banc brief

Amicus — Louisiana, Mississippi, March 14, 2019

LA MS amicus

Amicus — Sens. Cruz and Cornyn, March 14, 2019

Cruz Cornyn amicus

Amicus — Alliance Defending Freedom, March 14, 2019 (5th Cir. denied motion for leave to file)

ADF amicus

Amicus — with motion, Eagle Forum, March 14, 2019

Eagle Forum motion and amicus

Order on amicus briefing, March 19, 2019

17-50282_order on amicus briefing

04/05/2019 CASE CALENDARED for En Banc rehearing on Tuesday, 05/14/2019 in New Orleans In accordance with our policy, lead counsel only will receive via email at a later date a copy of the court’s docket and an acknowledgment form. All other counsel of record should monitor the court’s website for the posting of the oral argument calendars. [17-50282] (SME) [Entered: 04/05/2019 01:10 PM]

Appellees’ supplemental brief, April 8, 2019

5C PP v. Smith appellees’ en banc supplemental brief

18 Senators’ amicus, April 15, 2019

5C senators amicus

NHeLP amicus, April 15, 2019

5C NHeLP amicus

Texas additional authority — Herrera v. Wyoming, June 3, 2019

addl authority wyoming herrera

 

Planned Parenthood of Gulf Coast v. Gee, No. 3:15-cv-00565 (M.D. La.), on appeal, No. 17-30987 (5th Cir.), No. 17-1492

Fifth Circuit opinion, 9/14/16
15-30987-2016-09-14

Fifth Circuit opinion 6/29/17
15-30987-2016-09-14

States’ amicus brief supporting rehearing en banc, 7/24/17
5C PPG states’ rhb amicus

PP letter re Does v. Gillespie additional authority, 8/21/17
5C PPGee 8C add auth response

Dissent from denial of rehearing en banc, 11/28/17
PP v. Gee RHB

Cert extension request, 1/30/18
20180130181422949_DHH – PPGC DRAFT Cert Extension Motion

Supreme Court order extending time for filing for cert, 2/6/18
PP v Gee cert extension

Cert petition, 4/27/18
20180427135540119_Gee v Planned Parenthood_cert. petition_PDF-a

Amicus, 27 family organizations, 5/31/18
20180531124951132_17-1492 Amicus Brief of Twenty-Seven Family Policy Organizations

Amicus, 90 members of Congress, 5/31/18
20180531140245033_17-1492 Amcus BrIef of 90 Members of Congress

Amicus, Indiana, 5/31/18
20180531152126434_Brief of Indiana et. al. as Amici Curiae in Support of Petitioner

Amicus, ACLJ, 5/31/18
20180531164747384_Gee v PPGC Amicus ACLJ

Cert opposition, 7/2/2018
20180702130527612_Gee v. Planned Parenthood Brief in Opposition

Cert reply, 8/2/2018
20180802114632261_Gee v Planned Parenthood reply brief_pdfA

Cert denied, 12/10/2018

121018zor_f2ah

SIXTH CIRCUIT

See Planned Parenthood of Greater Ohio v. Hodges, 201 F.Supp.3d 898 (S.D. Ohio 2016), aff’d sub nom Planned Parenthood of Greater Ohio v. Himes, _ F.3d _,
2018 WL 1833196 (6th Cir., April 18, 2018), rev’d, 3/12/19

SEVENTH CIRCUIT

Planned Parenthood of Indiana v. Commissioner, 699 F.3d 962 (7th Cir. 2012)

EIGHTH CIRCUIT
Planned Parenthood of Arkansas & Eastern Oklahoma v. Gillespie, No. 4:15-cv-566 (E.D. Ark.), on appeal sub nom. Does v. Gillespie, No. 15-3271 (8th Cir.)

Opening brief, 12/1/15
8C PP appellant opening brief

Appellees’ brief, 1/29/16
8C PP appellee brief

Appellants’ reply brief, 2/26/16
8C PP appellant reply brief

Eighth Circuit opinion, 8/16/17
PPArk v GIllespie 8th cir opin

Petition for rehearing en banc, with exhibits, 8/30/17
8C PP pet rhr en banc

8C PP pet rhr ex 1

8C PP pet rhr ex 2

8C PP pet rhr ex 3

Opposition to petition for rehearing en banc, 10/24/17
Does v. Gillespie rehearing en banc op

Order denying rehearing en banc, 11/13/17
Does v. Gillespie order denying rehearing en banc

NINTH CIRCUIT

Planned Parenthood of Arizona v. Betlach, 727 F.3d 960 (9th Cir. 2013)

TENTH CIRCUIT

Planned Parenthood of Kansas v. Andersen, No. 16-3249 (10th Cir., Feb. 21, 2018), No. 17-1340
10th cir PP opinion

Joint motion to stay the mandate, 3/5/18
Document 9

Petition for certiorari, 3/21/18
20180321141128195_Andersen v. Planned Parenthood of Kansas et al._Petition

Request for extension of time to file response, 4/16/18
20180416145157114_Andersen – Request for Ext.

Americans United for Life cert-stage amicus, 4/23/18
20180423103023537_17-1340 Amicus Brief of American United for Life

Indiana et al cert-stage amicus, 4/23/18
20180423105359150_Brief of Indiana et al. as Amici Curiae in Support of Petitioner

Request for further extension, 5/16/18
20180516132705581_Anderson – Second Letter Request for Extension of Time

Opposition to further extension, 5/16/18
20180516163614026_Kansas Letter re extension

May 22 2018 Motion to further extend the time to file a response denied.

Certiorari opposition, 5/23/18
20180523164304452_17-1340 Brief in Opposition

Certiorari reply, 6/1/18
20180601103631521_17-1340 rb

Certiorari denial, 12/10/18

121018zor_f2ah

 

 

[Second Circuit foster care maintenance payments case]

New York State Citizens’ Coalition for Children v. Poole, No. 14-2919 (2d Cir., April 19, 2019)

14-2919Comp_opn 2

Motion for extension of time within which to seek rehearing en banc, April 26, 2019

5983378-0–1342314-2919 rh en banc xt request

 

D.O. v. Glisson, 847 F.3d 374 (6th Cir. 2017)

DO v Glisson

Midwest Foster Care and Adoption Ass’n v. Kincade, 712 F.3d 1190 (8th Cir. 2013)

Midwest Foster Care and Adoption Assn v Kincade

California State Foster Parents Ass’n v. Wagner, 624 F.3d 974 (9th Cir. 2010)

California State Foster Parent Assn v Wagner