DHHS, “Compliance With Statutory Program Integrity Requirements,” 84 Fed. Reg. 7714 (March 4, 2019)
Fact sheet, January 28, 2021
Supreme Court motion practice in Nos. 20-429, 20-454, 20-539
Cases: California, Maine, Maryland, Oregon, Northern Texas, Eastern Washington
SUPREME COURT MOTION PRACTICE IN 20-429, 20-454, 20-539
Ohio motion to intervene in Supreme Court case, March 8, 2021
20210308151317902_Title X Intervention Motion
Joint stipulation to dismiss, March 12, 2021
20210312173545229_20-429 and 20-539 – AMA v. Cochran – Oregon v. Cochran – Stipulation to Dismiss
American Ass’n of Pro-Life Ob’s and Gyn’s motion to interevene or present oral argument in Supreme Court case, March 12, 2021
AAPLObGyn’s motion for leave to file supplemental brief, and supplemental brief, March 15, 2021
Ohio et al motion for leave to file supplemental brief, and supplemental brief, March 15, 2021
20210315162546294_Motion for Leave to File Supp Brief
US opposition to motions to intervene, March 18, 2021
20210318164758577_20-429 et al. American Medical Assn et al. Govt Opp to Motions to Intervene
State petitioners’ opposition to motions to intervene, March 18, 2021
20210318191449392_20-539 States of Oregon et al Opposition to Motions to Intervene.Final
AMA, et al, opposition to motions to intervene, March 18, 2021
20210318192845954_20-429 and 20-454 – AMA v. Cochran – Opposition to Motions to Intervene
Ohio supplemental filing and motion for leave to file, March 19, 2021
20210319081851347_SCOTUS Motion for Leave to File Supp Brief re Intervention
AAPLObGyn supplemental filing and motion for leave to file, March 19, 2021
Ohio reply supporting intervention, March 19, 2021
20210319150728838_Reply ISO Intervention
AAPLObGyn reply supporting intervention, March 22, 2021
20210322130659907_2021.03.22 Reply in Support of Motion to Intervene with Declaration
Existing parties’ request for extension of time to file opening briefs, April 1, 2021
20210401141818710_extension letter merit 20-429 20-454 20-539
| Apr 01 2021 | Motion to extend the time to file the joint appendix and petitioners’ briefs on the merits is granted, and the time is extended to and including May 6, 2021. VIDED. |
US letter to the Court, April 15, 2021
20210415103405665_Letter 20-429 20-454 20-539
Order, April 26, 2021
20-429 ) AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSN., ET AL. V. BECERRA, SEC. OF H&HS, ET AL.
20-454 ) BECERRA, SEC. OF H&HS, ET AL. V. MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL BALTIMORE
20-539 ) OREGON, ET AL. V. BECERRA, SEC. OF H&HS, ET AL.
The Acting Solicitor General is directed to file a letter brief addressing the following question: Whether the Government intends to continue to enforce the challenged rule and regulations outside the State of Maryland until the completion of notice and comment; and, if further litigation is brought against the challenged rule and regulations outside of Maryland, how the Government would intend to respond. The brief, not to exceed three pages, is to be filed by Monday, May 3, 2021. The non-federal parties and the proposed intervenors may submit any responses in letter briefs, not to exceed three pages each, by
Monday, May 10, 2021.
Petitioners’ unopposed request for 2d extension to file opening briefs, April 29, 2021
20210429100438321_Extension letter 20-429 20-454 20-539 merit 2-1
US letter responding to April 26 order, May 3, 2021
20210503144133267_20-429 Am Med 20-454 and 20-539
Ohio letter responding to US letter, May 10, 2021
20210510152701058_Title X Response Letter
American Ass’n of Pro Life OB GYN letter, May 10, 2021
20210510163928117_2021.05.10 Response Letter Brief_Final-1
| May 17 2021 | The Government has filed a letter brief representing that it will continue enforcing the challenged rule and regulations outside the State of Maryland for as long as they remain operative. If further litigation is brought against the challenged rule and regulations outside of Maryland, the Government represents that it will either oppose that litigation on threshold grounds or seek to hold the litigation in abeyance pending the completion of notice and comment. In light of the Government’s representations, the motions for leave to intervene are denied, and the petitions in Nos. 20-429, 20-454, and 20-539 are dismissed pursuant to Rule 46.1. If the Government fails to enforce the challenged rule and regulations outside of Maryland prior to the completion of notice and comment, or if litigation is brought against the challenged rule and regulations outside of Maryland, any aggrieved party may file an application in this Court after seeking relief in the appropriate District Court and Court of Appeals. Justice Thomas, Justice Alito, and Justice Gorsuch would grant the motions for leave to intervene and deny the stipulations to dismiss the petitions. VIDED. |
CALIFORNIA
State of California by and through Becerra v. Azar, No. 3:19-cv-1184 (N.D. Cal.)
Complaint, March 4, 2019
Essential Access related case notice, March 11, 2019
Order on related case decision procedure, March 12, 2019
Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Edward M. Chen:
Initial Case Management Conference held on 3/20/2019. Plaintiffs to file motion for preliminary injunction by 3/21/2019. Opposition due by 4/8/2019. Reply due by 4/11/2019. Motion Hearing set for 4/18/2019 12:30 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom 05, 17th Floor before Judge Edward M. Chen. See pdf image for further details.
Total Time in Court: 25 Minutes.
Court Reporter: Katherine Sullivan.
Plaintiff Attorneys: Anna Rich, Michelle Ybarra, Justina Sessions.
Defendant Attorney: Bradley Humphries.
Attachment: Minute Order.
(afmS, COURT STAFF) (Date Filed: 3/20/2019) (Entered: 03/20/2019)
Motion for preliminary injunction, March 21, 2019
Brindis declaration, with attachments
Cantwell declaration
Castellano-Garcia declaration
Ferrer declaration
Forer declaration
Kost declaration
Marshall declaration
McCarthy declaration
McKinney declaration
Morris declaration
Nestor declaration
Rabinovitz declaration
Rich declaration, with attachments
Declaration of Anna Rich in Support of 26 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction filed byState of California. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit OPA Program Requirements, # 2 Exhibit California Medical Association, # 3 Exhibit Center for Reproductive Rights, # 4 Exhibit American Academy of Nursing, # 5 Exhibit Guttmacher Institute, # 6 Exhibit California Association for Nurse Practitioners, # 7 Exhibit American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, # 8 Exhibit Multistate Comment Letter, # 9 Exhibit American Medical Association, # 10 Exhibit American College of Nurse-Midwives, # 11 Exhibit American Public Health Association, # 12 Exhibit National Family Planning & Reproductive Health Association, # 13 Exhibit Planned Parenthood Federation of America, # 14 Exhibit American Academy of Pediatrics and the Society for Adolescent Health and Medicine, # 15 Exhibit Northeast Valley Health Corporation, # 16 Exhibit American College of Physicians, # 17 Exhibit American Academy of Family Physicians)(Related document(s) 26 ) (Rich, Anna) (Filed on 3/21/2019) (Entered: 03/21/2019)
Spirtos declaration
Thomas declaration
Tosh declaration
Tuttle declaration
Wilburn declaration
Sevier motion to intervene, memo, March 28, 2019
Institute for Policy Integrity amicus papers, April 5, 2019
Ohio amicus, April 8, 2019
US opposition, April 8, 2019
American Academy of Pediatrics amicus, April 8, 2019
Susan B. Anthony List amicus, April 9, 2019
ACLJ amicus, April 10, 2019
Plaintiffs’ reply supporting preliminary injunction, April 11, 2019
US opposition to Sevier intervention, April 11, 2019
Plaintiff’s opposition to Sevier intervention, April 11, 2019
Plaintiff’s preliminary injunction reply, April 11, 2019
Order for supplemental submissions re rulemaking, April 15, 2019
US supplemental submission, April 17, 2019
Plaintiffs’ supplemental submission, April 17, 2019
Opinion, April 26, 2019
Defendants’ notice re conscience regs, May 2, 2019
Defendants’ notice of appeal, May 6, 2019
Motion for stay pending appeal, with affidavit and proposed order, May 6, 2019
Motion for shortened time, with affidavit and proposed order, May 6, 2019
[Many amicus briefs, May 7, 2019]
Plaintiff’s opposition to motion for shortened time, with declaration and proposed order, May 8, 2019
Order denying stay but modifying injunction, May 8, 2019
Ninth Circuit # 19-15974
Motion for stay pending appeal, May 10, 2019
Opposition to stay pending appeal, May 20, 2019
Reply supporting stay pending appeal, May 24, 2019
Motion to stay trial court proceedings pending appeal, May 24, 2019
Related case suggestion, with declaration and attachments, May 24, 2019
US opposition to related case suggestion, May 28, 2019
Order denying related case, May 30, 2019
US opening brief, June 3, 2019
Ohio amicus, June 7, 2019
Americans United for Life amicus, June 7, 2019
9C Americans United for Life amicus
CA opposition to motion to stay trial court proceedings pending appeal, June 7, 2019
Private opposition to motion to stay trial court proceedings pending appeal, June 7, 2019 (in -1195)
American Center for Law and Justice amicus, June 10, 2019
Susan B. Anthony List amicus, June 10, 2019
9C Susan B Anthony List amicus
US notice re Obria, June 13, 2019
Ninth Circuit order granting stay pending appeal, June 20, 2019
9C order granting stay pending appeal
[Emergency motion for, see other cases below
Ninth Circuit scheduling order for response by 6/27 5 pm, June 25, 2019
Response opposing, June 25, 2019
Response opposing, June 27, 2019
9C appellant response opposing
States’ answering brief, July 1, 2019
States’ suggestion re initial en banc, July 1, 2019
9C state initial en banc suggestion
Private appellees’ petition for rehearing en banc of stay order, July 1, 2019
US 28(j) notice, Baltimore, July 2, 2019
Ninth Circuit en banc order, July 3, 2019
Ninth Circuit en banc order, July 8, 2019
Amicus briefing: NCLR
Amicus briefing: NHeLP
Amicus briefing: Institute for Policy Integrity
Amicus briefing: City of New York
Amicus briefing: 12 local governments
Amicus briefing: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
Amicus briefing: California Women’s Law Center
District court order denying stay pending appeal, July 9, 2019
US request for ruling, July 10, 2019
Order denying administrative stay, July 11, 2019
9C order denying motion for administrative stay
US reply brief, July 22, 2019
Private plaintiffs’ emergency recon motion, July 25, 2019
9C private plaintiffs emergency recon
States’ emergency recon motion, July 25, 2019
US motion to dismiss, July 30, 2019
Oral argument notices, July 29 and August 1, 2019
Stipulated scheduling order, August 6, 2019
Planned Parenthood notice, August 14, 2019
Planned Parenthood notice 19-35386_Documents
US response to Planned Parenthood notice, August 15, 2019
Plaintiffs’ opposition to US motion to dismiss, August 20, 2019
Ohio motion to participate in oral argument, September 3, 2019
Ohio amicus motion re argument time
US reply supporting motion to dismiss, September 4, 2019
Order denying Ohio motion to participate in oral argument, September 5, 2019
Notice re Baltimore decision, September 13, 2019
| 10/01/2019 | 151 | CLERK’S NOTICE: The Court stays Defendants Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 136 in Case No. 19-cv-01184 and Docket No. 109 in Case No. 19-cv-01195) given the pendency of appeal before the Ninth Circuit. The hearing currently scheduled for October 8, 2019 is vacated, and the Motion is stayed until further order. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (afmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/1/2019) (Entered: 10/01/2019) |
Order denying trial-level bifurcation, October 24, 2019
Plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment, January 23, 2020
[Exhibits]
US renewed motion to dismiss/summary judgment opposition, February 3, 2020
Plaintiffs’ summary judgment reply/opposition, February 10, 2020
US reply, February 12, 2020
Ninth Circuit opinion, February 24, 2020
US notice re renewed summary judgment motion, February 25, 2020
Order for plaintiff response by 3/13, February 27, 2020
Plaintiffs’ abeyance request, March 12, 2020
| 03/12/2020 | 184 | CLERK’S NOTICE: Pursuant to Plaintiffs’ recent filings (see Docket No. 183 in Case No. 19-1184 and Docket No. 150 in Case No. 19-1195), the Court holds the pending motions for summary judgment and for dismissal in abeyance and schedules a status conference for 6/18/2020 10:30 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom 05, 17th Floor before Judge Edward M. Chen. Joint status report due 6/11/2020. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (afmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/12/2020) (Entered: 03/12/2020) |
Providers’ rehearing en banc request, April 8, 2020
States’ full court reconsideration request, April 8, 2020
Order denying states’ full court reconsideration request, May 8, 2020
| 05/14/2020 | 186 | CLERK’S NOTICE: In light of the 9th Circuit’s recent order denying the petition of Plaintiffs-Appellees Essential Access Health, Inc. and Melissa Marshall, M.D. for full court or limited en banc court rehearing, the parties are directed to inform the Court as to how they plan to proceed and what issues remain for the Court to decide. The parties are to respond within one week; responses are limited to no more than five pages. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (afmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/14/2020) (Entered: 05/14/2020) |
US response to May 14 order, May 21, 2020
California response to May 14 order, June 4, 2020
| 06/04/2020 | 193 | CLERK’S NOTICE: Pursuant to Requests in 192 and 157 , Court GRANTS Stay and continuance of status conference in this and related case. Status Conference set for 6/18/2020 is vacated and rescheduled for 11/19/2020 10:30 AM in San Francisco before Judge Edward M. Chen. Joint Status Report due by 11/12/2020. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (afmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/4/2020) (Entered: 06/04/2020) |
| 06/04/2020 | 194 | CLERK’S NOTICE: Motions 134 , 138 , 162 , 167 have been terminated. Parties may renotice these motions at a later date. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (afmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/4/2020) (Entered: 06/04/2020) |
Notice of cert petition, October 7, 2020
Stipulation with proposed order, March 4, 2021
Order, March 5, 2021
Ohio motion to intervene in Supreme Court case, March 8, 2021
20210308151317902_Title X Intervention Motion
Joint stipulation to dismiss, March 12, 2021
20210312173545229_20-429 and 20-539 – AMA v. Cochran – Oregon v. Cochran – Stipulation to Dismiss
American Ass’n of Pro-Life Ob’s and Gyn’s motion to interevene or present oral argument in Supreme Court case, March 12, 2021
AAPLObGyn’s motion for leave to file supplemental brief, and supplemental brief, March 15, 2021
Ohio et al motion for leave to file supplemental brief, and supplemental brief, March 15, 2021
20210315162546294_Motion for Leave to File Supp Brief
US opposition to motions to intervene, March 18, 2021
20210318164758577_20-429 et al. American Medical Assn et al. Govt Opp to Motions to Intervene
State petitioners’ opposition to motions to intervene, March 18, 2021
20210318191449392_20-539 States of Oregon et al Opposition to Motions to Intervene.Final
AMA, et al, opposition to motions to intervene, March 18, 2021
20210318192845954_20-429 and 20-454 – AMA v. Cochran – Opposition to Motions to Intervene
Ohio supplemental filing and motion for leave to file, March 19, 2021
20210319081851347_SCOTUS Motion for Leave to File Supp Brief re Intervention
[]
California stipulation for voluntary dismissal, July 1, 2021
Order dismissing California, July 2, 2021
Essential Access Health v. Azar, No. 4:19-cv-1195 (N.D. Cal.)
Complaint, March 4, 2019
Certification of interested entities or persons, March 11, 2019
Motion for preliminary injunction/proposed order, March 21, 2019
Ybarra declaration, with attachments
For other versions of the Rabinovitz, Marshall, Kost, Brindis, Ferrer, Forer, Tosh, Wilburn, Thomas, Nestor, McKinney, Spirtos file0.608165015970496, Castellano-Garcia, Tuttle, and McCarthy declarations, see above.
For other versions of the US opposition, American Academy of Pediatrics amicus, April 8, see above
For other versions of the reply, April 11, 2019, see above
Essential Access Health petition for rehearing en banc, April 9, 2020
9C essential access health pet rheb
Essential Access stipulation for voluntary dismissal, July 1, 2021
Order dismissing Essential Access, July 2, 2021
Obria Group v. U.S. D.H.H.S., No. 8:19-cv-905 (C.D. Cal.)
Complaint, May 14, 2019
US letter to plaintiffs, June 13, 2019
HHS letter to Obria plaintiffs
Voluntary dismissal, June 13, 2019
Obria notice of voluntary dismissal
MAINE
Family Planning Ass’n of Maine v. Azar, No. 1:19-cv-100 (D. Maine)
Complaint, filed March 6, 2019
Maine Family Planning complaint
Motion for preliminary injunction, with memo and declarations, March 25, 2019
[various amicus briefs]
[American Academy of Pediatrics et al amicus,
Opposition to motion for preliminary injunction, April 15, 2019
[Americans United for Life amicus,
[Alabama et al amicus,
Reply memo supporting preliminary injunction, April 23, 2019
Withdrawal of PI motion, with copy of Eastern Washington injunction, May 26, 2019
Notice re HHS letter to Obria plaintiffs, June 13, 2019, with letter
HHS letter to Obria plaintiffs
Plaintiffs’ motion to reopen preliminary injunction proceedings, June 21, 2019
US response to motion to reopen, June 25, 2019
Order denying preliminary injunction, July 3, 2019
Motion to modify injunction or for injunction pending appeal, with memo and supporting materials, July 16, 2019
US opposition to motion to modify or for injunction pending appeal, July 23, 2019
Reply memo and declarations supporting motion, July 29, 2019
Order denying motion to amend order and motion for injunction pending appeal, August 9, 2019
Maine FP order denying to amend and denying ipa
Maine Family Planning notice of appeal, August 15, 2019
First Circuit # 19-1836
Joint motion to stay district court proceedings pending appeal, August 29, 2019
| 08/30/2019 | 92 | ORDER granting 91 Motion to Stay District Court Proceedings Pending Appeal By JUDGE LANCE E. WALKER. (jwr) (Entered: 08/30/2019) |
Stipulation to dismiss appeal, October 22, 2019
Judgment re voluntary dismissal of appeal, October 23, 2019
| 10/24/2019 | Reset Answer Deadline- The Mandate having been filed on 10/23/19 and the case is no longer stayed: Defendants’ Answer due by 11/14/2019. (mjlt) (Entered: 10/24/2019) |
Motion for leave to file, amended complaint, November 21, 2019
US motion to dismiss, January 16, 2020
US statement of undisputed material facts 1 16 20
Plaintiffs’ memo for summary judgment/opposition, February 27, 2020
[Declarations]
Statement of undisputed facts, February 27, 2020
pltf statement undisp material facts
| 03/20/2020 | Reset Deadlines as to 111 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim and MOTION for Summary Judgment per General Order 2020-2 issued by Chief Judge Jon D. Levy on 3/18/2020: Reply due by 4/30/2020. (mlm) (Entered: 03/20/2020) | |
| 03/20/2020 | Reset Deadlines as to 113 MOTION for Summary Judgment per General Order 2020-2 issued by Chief Judge Jon D. Levy on 3/18/2020: Responses due by 4/30/2020. Reply due by 5/29/2020. (mlm) (Entered: 03/20/2020) |
US summary judgment reply/summary judgment opposition, and response to statement of facts, April 30, 2020
Maine Family Planning summary judgment reply, May 29, 2020
Decision and Order, June 9, 2020
Notice of appeal, August 7, 2020
First Circuit # 20-1781
Unopposed motion for stay, December 15, 2020
Motion to extend briefing deadlines, January 6, 2021
1C emergency motion to stay briefing
Stay order, January 6, 2021
Joint motion to hold case in abeyance, May 25, 2021
Abeyance1C abeyance order 6 7 order, June 7, 2021
Joint status report, August 6, 2021
1C MFP joint status report 8 6 21
Stipulation to dismiss appeal, October 14, 2021
Order dismissing appeal, October 15, 2021
=======
MARYLAND
Mayor and City Council of Baltimore v. Azar, No. 1:19-cv-1103 (D. Md.)
Opinion, May 30, 2019
Order denying motion to stay pending appeal, June 19, 2019
Fourth Circuit # 19-1614
Motion for stay pending appeal, June 20, 2019
Motion to expedite appeal, June 20, 2019
Requests for plaintiffs to file responses by June 26, June 21, 2019
Fourth Circuit stay order, July 2, 2019
Ohio amicus, July 3, 2019
Emergency motion for rehearing en banc, July 3, 2019
Fourth Circuit request for response, July 9, 2019
US response, July 12, 2019
Status report, July 15, 2019
US request for extension of time to answer, July 15, 2019
Order partially granting extension of time, July 16, 2019
Ohio, et al, request to participate in oral argument, July 16, 2019
Fourth Circuit order requiring Baltimore reply to opposition to en banc motion, July 19, 2019
Motion to stay pending appeal, July 22, 2019
US Balt motion to stay pending appeal
Reply supporting en banc motion, July 22, 2019
Response brief, July 29, 2019
Baltimore opposition to stay pending appeal, July 31, 2019
Baltimore op to stay pending appeal
City of New York amicus, August 5, 2019
NHeLP amicus, August 5, 2019
National Center for Lesbian Rights amicus, August 5, 2019
4C National Center for Lesbian Rights amicus
Institute for Policy Integrity amicus, August 5, 2019
4C institute for policy integrity amicus
National Center for Youth Law amicus, August 5, 2019
4C National Center for Youth Law amicus
ACOG amicus, August 5, 2019
US reply supporting stay pending appeal, August 13, 2019
US motion to dismiss, August 16, 2019
Baltimore v Azar US motion to dismiss
US opening brief, August 19, 2019
Order denying stay, August 20, 2019
Response to motion to dismiss, August 26, 2019
Baltimore response to motion to dismiss
ACOG unopposed motion to participate in oral argument, August 26, 2019
4C unopposed ACOG mo to participate OA
Order granting ACOG motion to participate in oral argument, August 28, 2019
US reply supporting motion to dismiss, August 30, 2019
Baltimore US reply supporting motion to dismiss
Order denying rehearing, September 3, 2019
Order partially denying motion to dismiss, September 12, 2019
Baltimore order on motion to dismiss
Parties’ joint scheduling status report, September 20, 2019
Scheduling order, September 26, 2019
Plaintiff’s motion and memo for summary judgment, November 1, 2019
Defendant’s opposition and cross motion, November 15, 2019
Plaintiffs’ supplemental authority, November 18, 2019
Pltf supp auth 19-1614_Documents
Defendants’ supplemental authority response, November 25, 2019
Plaintiffs’ summary judgment opposition/reply, December 2, 2019
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists amicus, December 9, 2019
US summary judgment reply, December 16, 2019
Plaintiff ‘supplemental authority,’ i.e., transcript, February 10, 2020
Summary judgment opinion and order, February 14, 2020
Baltimore dist opinion 2 14 20
Supplemental authority, February 17, 2020
4C Balt addl auth (trial court)
US notice of appeal, February 24, 2020
Baltimore motion to clarify judgment, February 24, 2020
Fourth Circuit # 20-1215
Clarified order, February 26, 2020
US notice of supp authority (Ninth Circuit), February 27, 2020
US motion for stay pending appeal, February 28, 2020
US motion for stay pending appeal
Plaintiffs’ response to additional authority (Ninth Circuit), February 28, 2020
Plaintiffs’ opposition to motion for stay pending appeal, March 2, 2020
Plaintiffs’ additional authority response (Ninth Circuit), March 3, 2020
Order denying stay pending appeal, March 4, 2020
Order denying stay pending appeal 3 4 20
Plaintiffs’ opposition to consolidating appeals, March 4, 2020
US reply re consolidating appeals, March 6, 2020
4C US reply re not dismissing first appeal
US motion for stay pending appeal in second appeal, March 6, 2020
4C US motion for stay pending appeal
Baltimore reply supporting dismissing first appeal, March 9, 2020
4C pltf reply re dismissal of PI appeal
Plaintiffs’ motion to make judgment nationwide, March 13, 2020
Balt motion to make judgment nationwide
US opposition to making judgment nationwide, March 20, 2020
Plaintiffs’ reply supporting initial hearing en banc, March 23, 2020
Plaintiffs’ notice of intent to file reply, March 24, 2020
Corrected order consolidating cases and granting initial hearing en banc, March 30, 2020
4C order initial hearing en banc
Order denying stay pending appeal, March 30, 2020
Amended order denying stay pending appeal, March 31, 2020
US response re notice of intent to respond, April 10, 2020
US supplemental opening brief, April 10, 2010
4C US supplemental opening brief
Opinion and order denying nationwide relief, April 15, 2020
Ohio supplemental amicus brief, April 17, 2020
Baltimore extension request re amicus, April 23, 2020
Order requesting response, April 23, 2020
4C request for response by 4 27
US opposition to extension request, April 23, 2020
Baltimore reply supporting extension request, April 23, 2020
Baltimore supplemental response brief, April 24, 2020
AMA amicus, April 28, 2020
Clopton amicus, April 28, 2020
Order denying motion to extend reply brief time, April 28, 2020
4C order denying motion to extend rb
Institute for Policy Integrity supplemental amicus, April 28, 2020
4C inst policy integrity supp amicus
US supplemental reply brief, May 1, 2020
Nat’l Family Planning & Reproductive Health Ass’n supplemental amicus, May 1, 2020
California supplemental amicus, May 1, 2020
US supplemental authority (Ninth Circuit), May 11, 2020
Baltimore response to US supplemental authority, May 12, 2020
US additional authority (Maine), June 11, 2020
Plaintiffs’ additional authority response (Maine), June 15, 2020
4C pltf addl auth response maine
Plaintiffs’ additional authority (DACA), June 22, 2020
US response to plaintiffs’ additional authority, June 26, 2020
4C US nationwide vacatur addl auth resp
Opinion on rehearing en banc, September 3, 2020
Opinion attachment, September 3, 2020
Judgment, September 3, 2020
Joint status report, September 18, 2020
US cert petition, October 7, 2020, No. 20-454
20201008110146702_Azar v. Baltimore Pet updated
Plaintiffs’ response, December 14, 2020
20201214163417679_20-454_Resp-1
US cert reply, December 23, 2020
20201223141412870_20-454 Azar v. Baltimore Cert Reply FINAL
| Dec 23 2020 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/8/2021. |
[]
Joint status report, February 12, 2021
Abeyance order, February 18, 2021
Baltimore abeyance order 2 18 21
| Feb 22 2021 | Petition GRANTED. The petitions for writs of certiorari in Nos. 20-429 and 20-539 are granted. The cases are consolidated, and a total of one hour is allotted for oral argument. VIDED. |
| Feb 22 2021 | Because the Court has consolidated these cases for briefing and oral argument, future filings and activity in the cases will now be reflected on the docket of No. 20-429. Subsequent filings in these cases must therefore be submitted through the electronic filing system in No. 20-429. Each document submitted in connection with one or more of these cases must include on its cover the case number and caption for each case in which the filing is intended to be submitted. Where a filing is submitted in fewer than all of the cases, the docket entry will reflect the case number(s) in which the filing is submitted; a document filed in all of the consolidated cases will be noted as “VIDED.” |
Ohio motion to intervene in Supreme Court case, March 8, 2021
20210308151317902_Title X Intervention Motion
Joint stipulation to dismiss, March 12, 2021
20210312191711724_20-454 – Cochran v. Baltimore – Stipulation to Dismiss
American Ass’n of Pro-Life Ob’s and Gyn’s motion to interevene or present oral argument in Supreme Court case, March 12, 2021
AAPLObGyn’s motion for leave to file supplemental brief, and supplemental brief, March 15, 2021
Ohio et al motion for leave to file supplemental brief, and supplemental brief, March 15, 2021
20210315162546294_Motion for Leave to File Supp Brief
Ohio et al motion for leave to file supplemental brief, and supplemental brief, March 15, 2021
20210315162546294_Motion for Leave to File Supp Brief
US opposition to motions to intervene, March 18, 2021
20210318164758577_20-429 et al. American Medical Assn et al. Govt Opp to Motions to Intervene
State petitioners’ opposition to motions to intervene, March 18, 2021
20210318191449392_20-539 States of Oregon et al Opposition to Motions to Intervene.Final
AMA, et al, opposition to motions to intervene, March 18, 2021
20210318192845954_20-429 and 20-454 – AMA v. Cochran – Opposition to Motions to Intervene
Ohio supplemental filing and motion for leave to file, March 19, 2021
20210319081851347_SCOTUS Motion for Leave to File Supp Brief re Intervention
Joint status report in district court, April 1, 2021
Balt Title X status report 4 1 21
District court approval, April 5, 2021
Balt post status report order 4 5 21
Joint status report, June 1, 2021
Joint status report, June 11, 2021
Joint status report, June 16, 2021
Final judgment order, June 16, 2021
OREGON
State of Oregon v. Azar, No. 6:19-cv-317 (D. Or.)
Complaint, filed March 5, 2019
States’ motion for preliminary injunction, March 21, 2019
[Alexander-Scott declaration
Alifante declaration
Anderson declaration
Brandt declaration
Byrd declaration
Camp declaration
Charest declaration
Childs-Roshak declaration
Cooke declaration
Darney declaration
David declaration
Drew declaration
Gallagher declaration
Gillespie declaration
Handler declaration
Holmes declaration
Keenan declaration
Kunkel declaration
Lightner declaration
Lytle-Barnaby declaration
MacNaughton declaration
Nelson declaration
Preiss declaration
Rattay declaration
Reece declaration
Rimberg declaration
Ross declaration
Schaler-Haynes declaration
Skinner declaration
Stephens declaration
Tobias declaration
Walker Harris declaration
Wilson declaration
Zoll declaration
ACOG amicus, April 9, 2019
Ohio amicus, April 11, 2019
US opposition to motion for preliminary injunction, April 11, 2019
Private plaintiffs’ preliminary injunction reply, April 19, 2019
Declaration
State plaintiffs’ preliminary injunction reply, April 19.2019
Declarations
Plaintiffs’ notice re PI in Eastern Washington case, April 25, 2019
Oregon plaintiffs notice re suppl authority 4 25
Defendants’ response re PI, April 26, 2019
Oregon defendants notice re suppl authority 4 26
Plaintiffs’ reply re PI, April 26, 2019
Oregon plaintiffs joint reply re suppl authority 4 26
Order for preliminary injunction, April 29, 2019
Defendants’ notice re conscience regulations, May 2, 2019
Defendants’ notice of appeal, May 3, 2019
Defendants’ motion for stay pending appeal, May 3, 2019
Johnson declaration supporting motion for stay, May 3, 2019
Ninth Circuit # 19-35386
| 05/06/2019 | 152 | ORDER: Defendants ask the Court to stay the nationwide injunction entered last week. In their motion, Defendants specifically request that “If upon reviewing this motion the Court does not believe Defendants have met the requirements for a stay, Defendants request that the Court summarily deny the motion without awaiting a response from Plaintiffs.” The Court respectfully disagrees with defendants’ position and, in accordance with their request, summarily denies the motion to stay 150 in case 6:19-cv-00317-MC; 143 in case 6:19-cv-00318-MC. without awaiting a response from plaintiffs. Ordered by Judge Michael J. McShane. Associated Cases: 6:19-cv-00317-MC, 6:19-cv-00318-MC (cp) (Entered: 05/06/2019) |
US motion for stay pending appeal, May 10, 2019
Private op to stay pending appeal, May 20, 2019
State op to stay pending appeal, May 20, 2019
Reply supporting stay pending appeal, May 24, 2019
Opening brief, May 31, 2019
American Center on Law and Justice amicus, June 7, 2019
9C American Center for Law and Justice amicus
Ohio amicus, June 7, 2019
Americans United for Life amicus, June 7, 2019
9C Americans United for Life amicus (Oregon)
Susan B. Anthony List amicus, June 7, 2019
9C Susan B Anthony List amicus
Ninth Circuit order granting stay pending appeal, June 20, 2019
9C order granting stay pending appeal
Emergency motion, and addendum, June 20, 2019
Opposition to emergency motion, June 21, 2019
Ninth Circuit scheduling order, June 25, 2019, see
[Answering brief], June 28, 2019
[Petition for initial hearing en banc], June 28, 2019
[Conditional petition for initial hearing en banc], June 28, 2019
Ninth Circuit private answering brief, June 28, 2019
9C private answering brief 6 28
Ninth Circuit states’ answering brief, June 28, 2019
US reply brief, July 19, 2019
US motion for stay, trial level, July 19, 2019
| 07/25/2019 | 178 | Scheduling Order by Judge Michael J. McShane: Plaintiffs’ Response to Motion for Stay (176 in 6:19-cv-00317-MC, 160 in 6:19-cv-00318-MC) is due by 8/2/2019. Defendants’ Reply is due by 8/9/2019. Ordered by Judge Michael J. McShane.Associated Cases: 6:19-cv-00317-MC, 6:19-cv-00318-MC (cp) (Entered: 07/25/2019) |
Stay opposition (private), August 2, 2019
Declarations (private), August 2, 2019
Stay opposition (states), August 2, 2019
Defendants’ pro-stay reply, August 9, 2019
Order denying full court en banc reconsideration, August 16, 2019
Order denying reconsideration, August 20, 2019
Order staying trial proceedings pending appeal, September 17, 2019
| 05/11/2020 | 205 | Scheduling Order by Judge Michael J. McShane: In light of the ruling from the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, a Status Report is due by 6/11/2020. Ordered by Judge Michael J. McShane.Associated Cases: 6:19-cv-00317-MC, 6:19-cv-00318-MC (cp) (Entered: 05/11/2020) |
Joint status report, June 11, 2020
Cert petition, No. 20-539 (docketed October 23, 2020)
20201005175922895_Oregon v. Azar_Petition for Writ
US cert response, December 4, 2020
20201204170013927_20-429 and 20-539 Opp
Cert reply, December 22, 2020
20201222105130057_20-539 Oregon v Azar Reply Brief
| Dec 23 2020 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/8/2021. |
[]
| Feb 22 2021 | Petition GRANTED. The petitions for writs of certiorari in Nos. 20-429 and 20-454 are granted. The cases are consolidated, and a total of one hour is allotted for oral argument. VIDED. |
| Feb 22 2021 | Because the Court has consolidated these cases for briefing and oral argument, future filings and activity in the cases will now be reflected on the docket of No. 20-429. Subsequent filings in these cases must therefore be submitted through the electronic filing system in No. 20-429. Each document submitted in connection with one or more of these cases must include on its cover the case number and caption for each case in which the filing is intended to be submitted. Where a filing is submitted in fewer than all of the cases, the docket entry will reflect the case number(s) in which the filing is submitted; a document filed in all of the consolidated cases will be noted as “VIDED.” |
Joint stipulation to dismiss, March 12, 2021
20210312173545229_20-429 and 20-539 – AMA v. Cochran – Oregon v. Cochran – Stipulation to Dismiss
American Ass’n of Pro-Life Ob’s and Gyn’s motion to interevene or present oral argument in Supreme Court case, March 12, 2021
AAPLObGyn’s motion for leave to file supplemental brief, and supplemental brief, March 15, 2021
Ohio et al motion for leave to file supplemental brief, and supplemental brief, March 15, 2021
20210315162546294_Motion for Leave to File Supp Brief
| 05/27/2021 | 215 | Scheduling Order by Judge Michael J. McShane. The parties are ordered to file a Joint Status Report with the Court by 6/28/2021. Ordered by Judge Michael J. McShane.Associated Cases: 6:19-cv-00317-MC, 6:19-cv-00318-MC (cp) (Entered: 05/27/2021) |
Notice of voluntary dismissal, June 25, 2021
Judgment, June 28, 2021
American Medical Ass’n v. Azar, No. 6:19-cv-318 (D. Or.)
Complaint, March 5, 2019
Motion for preliminary injunction, March 21, 2019
Custer declaration
Gardner declaration
Udall declaration
Ewing declaration
Megregian declaration
Williams declaration
Madara declaration
Atkinson declaration
Black declaration
Brindis declaration
Kost declaration
Amicus brief
[HHS notice re Obria, June 13, 2019]
[Petition for certiorari, October 1, 2020]
[documents uri=_unstructured_binary_casebriefs_ama-v-azar-us-sup-ct-certiorari]
For Supreme Court motion practice, see above
WASHINGTON
State of Washington v. Azar, No. 1:19-cv-3040 (E.D. Wash)
Complaint, March 5, 2019
Unopposed consolidation motion, March 18, 2019
Consolidation and expedition order, March 18, 2019
WvA consolidation expedition order
State’s motion for preliminary injunction with proposed order, March 22, 2019
Eastlund declaration
Harris declaration
Khattar declaration
Kimelman declaration
Marsalli declaration
Schumacher declaration
Beneski declaration, with attachments
Amicus brief Am Academy of Pediatrics, April ? 9, 2019
Amicus brief Inst Policy Integrity, April ? 10, 2019
Institute for Policy Integrity amicus
Amicus brief Ohio, April ? 12, 2019
US opposition to motion for preliminary injunction, April 12, 2019
Private plaintiffs’ preliminary injunction reply, April 19, 2019
State’s preliminary injunction reply, April 19, 2019
Order for preliminary injunction, April 25, 2019
Defendants’ notice re conscience regulations, May 2, 2019
Defendants’ notice re conscience regs
Notice of appeal, May 3, 2019
Motion to stay pending appeal, with affidavit and proposed order, May 3, 2019
Motion to expedite hearing on motion to stay, May 3, 2019
Motion to expedite hearing on motion to stay
Errata: Johnson declaration, proposed order, May 4, 2019
Ninth Circuit # 19-35394
Response to motion to expedite, May 6, 2019
Response to motion to expedite
| 05/07/2019 | 66 | TEXT ORDER: Defendants’ Motion to Expedite, ECF No. 59 , is DENIED. The hearing set for May 10, 2019 on Defendant’s Motion to Stay, ECF No. 58 , is continued to May 23, 2019. The deadline for filing Plaintiffs’ response to Defendant’s Motion to Stay is May 17, 2019. The deadline for any reply is May 22, 2019. Signed by Judge Stanley A Bastian. Text entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the court order on the matter. (LR, Case Administrator) (Entered: 05/07/2019) |
US motion to stay (Ninth Circuit), May 13, 2019
9C Washington v. Azar US mo to stay
Response to motion to stay (State), May 17, 2019
Response to motion to stay (private), May 17, 2019
Reply supporting motion to stay, May 21, 2019
Motion to stay trial court proceedings pending 9C appeal, May 24, 2019
US opening brief, May 31, 2019
Order denying motion to stay pending appeal, June 3, 2019
Wash v Azar order denying motion to stay
Private opposition to motion to stay trial court proceedings, June 7, 2019
Wash v Azar private stay of trial court proceedings op
State opposition to motion to stay trial court proceedings pending appeal, June 7, 2019
Wash v. Azar state op to motion to stay trial court proceedings
Ohio amicus, June 7, 2019
Americans United for Life amicus, June 7, 2019
9C Americans United for Life amicus (Washington)
Susan B. Anthony List amicus, June 7, 2019
9C Susan B Anthony List amicus (Washington)
Notice re Obria, June 13, 2019
Order denying stay of trial court proceedings, June 14, 2019
Order denying stay of E Wa trial court proceedings
Ninth Circuit order granting stay pending appeal, June 20, 2019
9C order granting stay pending appeal
Emergency motion, and addendum, June 20, 2019
Opposition to emergency motion, June 21, 2019
Emergency motion for reconsideration, June 24, 2019
Ninth Circuit scheduling order, June 25, 2019, see other cases above
Ninth Circuit state’s answering brief, June 28, 2019
Ninth Circuit private answering brief, June 28, 2019
9C 15394 private answering brief
US reply brief, July 19, 2019
Joint scheduling proposal, August 12, 2019
WA v Azar joint scheduling proposal
[For Ninth Circuit order 8/16, see Oregon]
US motion to dismiss, October 7, 2019
State opposition to motion to dismiss, November 20, 2019
Exhibits
Private opposition to motion to dismiss, November 20, 2019
Exhibits
US reply supporting motion, January 10, 2020
Susan B Anthony List motion and amicus, January 23, 2020
State reply, February 3, 2020
Private reply, February 3, 2020
For Ninth Circuit opinion, see the Northern California appeal
Order striking hearing and ordering briefing, February 24, 2020
Order striking hearing and setting briefing
Parties’ plan for further briefing, March 5, 2020
Joint statement re future proceedings
| 03/06/2020 | 148 | TEXT ORDER – Pursuant to the request of the parties, ECF No. 147 , the Court holds the above-captioned case in abeyance, pending any further appellate review of the Ninth Circuits February 24, 2020 decision. The parties are directed to file a joint status report on or before June 5, 2020. For court docket management purposes only, Defendants Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, or in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 112 , and Plaintiffs Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment, ECF Nos. 118 and 121 , are STRICKEN, with leave to renew. The District Court Executive is directed to set a case management deadline. Signed by Judge Stanley A. Bastian. Text entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the court order on the matter. (LR, Case Administrator) (Entered: 03/06/2020) |
Joint status report, June 5, 2020
Joint status report order, June 22, 2020
Wash v Azar joint status 6 22 20
Cert petition, 20-429
20201001132138922_AMA et al. — Cert. Petition FINAL
Status report, October 9, 2020
Order continuing abeyance, October 19, 2020
WA abeyance contin order 10 19 20
US request for extension to respond to cert petition, October 23, 2020
20201023122407339_Extension Letter 20-429
Oregon et al brief, November 4, 2020
20201106160015291_20-429 State Resps in Support of Petition-FINAL
US cert response, December 4, 2020
20201204165604895_20-429 and 20-539 Opp
Plaintiffs’ reply, December 22, 2020
20201222130201273_20-429 cert. reply
| Dec 23 2020 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/8/2021. |
[]
| Feb 22 2021 | Petition GRANTED. The petitions for writs of certiorari in Nos. 20-454 and 20-539 are granted. The cases are consolidated, and a total of one hour is allotted for oral argument. VIDED. |
| Feb 22 2021 | Because the Court has consolidated these cases for briefing and oral argument, future filings and activity in the cases will now be reflected on the docket of No. 20-429. Subsequent filings in these cases must therefore be submitted through the electronic filing system in No. 20-429. Each document submitted in connection with one or more of these cases must include on its cover the case number and caption for each case in which the filing is intended to be submitted. Where a filing is submitted in fewer than all of the cases, the docket entry will reflect the case number(s) in which the filing is submitted; a document filed in all of the consolidated cases will be noted as “VIDED.” |
Joint status report, March 8, 2021
WAvT Title X joint status 3 8 21
Continued abeyance order, March 9, 2021
WA v. Azar Title X continued abeyance 3 9 21
Joint stipulation to dismiss, March 12, 2021
20210312173545229_20-429 and 20-539 – AMA v. Cochran – Oregon v. Cochran – Stipulation to Dismiss
American Ass’n of Pro-Life Ob’s and Gyn’s motion to interevene or present oral argument in Supreme Court case, March 12, 2021
AAPLObGyn’s motion for leave to file supplemental brief, and supplemental brief, March 15, 2021
Ohio et al motion for leave to file supplemental brief, and supplemental brief, March 15, 2021
20210315162546294_Motion for Leave to File Supp Brief
US opposition to motions to intervene, March 18, 2021
20210318164758577_20-429 et al. American Medical Assn et al. Govt Opp to Motions to Intervene
State petitioners’ opposition to motions to intervene, March 18, 2021
20210318191449392_20-539 States of Oregon et al Opposition to Motions to Intervene.Final
AMA, et al, opposition to motions to intervene, March 18, 2021
20210318192845954_20-429 and 20-454 – AMA v. Cochran – Opposition to Motions to Intervene
Ohio supplemental filing and motion for leave to file, March 19, 2021
20210319081851347_SCOTUS Motion for Leave to File Supp Brief re Intervention
Joint status report, June 1, 2021
| 06/02/2021 | 162 | TEXT ORDER: Pursuant to the parties’ Joint Status Report Pursuant to the Court’s March 9, 2021 Order, ECF No. 161 , the parties shall file a status report on or before June 11, 2021 to update the Court on the status of and anticipated next steps in these matters. Signed by Chief Judge Stanley A. Bastian. Text entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the court order on the matter. (CLP, Case Administrator) (Entered: 06/02/2021) |
Joint status report, June 11, 2021
Stipulation for dismissal without prejudice, June 11, 2021
Order dismissing case without prejudice, June 11, 2021
National Family Planning & Reproductive Health Ass’n v. Azar, No. 1:19-cv-3045 (E.D. Wash.)
Complaint, March 5, 2019
Motion for preliminary injunction, with proposed order, March 22, 2019, filed in 3040
Coleman declaration
Kost declaration
Cantrell declaration
Adams declaration
Kruse declaration
Madden declaration
Maisen declaration
Prager declaration
For further proceedings, see 3040
History of the Title X regulations
[]
Rust v. Sullivan, 500 U.S. 173 (1991)
Presidential Memorandum, The Title X “Gag Rule,” Jan. 22, 1993, reprinted at 58 Fed. Reg. 7455 (Feb. 5, 1993)
Public Health Service, “Standards of Compliance for Abortion-Related Services in Family Planning Service Projects,” interim rule: suspension of effectiveness, 58 Fed. Reg. 7462 (Feb. 5, 1993)
HHS, Standards of Compliance for Abortion-Related Services in Family Planning Services Projects, 65 Fed. Reg. 41,270 (July 3, 2000)
DHHS, “Compliance With Statutory Program Integrity Requirements,” 84 Fed. Reg. 7714 (March 4, 2019)
Fact sheet, January 28, 2021
DHHS, Ensuring Access to Equitable, Affordable, Client-Centered, Quality Family Planning Services, 86 Fed. Reg. 19,812 (April 15, 2021)
non Federal Register version, 4/14/2021
DHHS, Ensuring Access to Equitable, Affordable, Client-Centered, Quality Family Planning Services, 86] Fed. Reg. 56,144 (October 7, 2021)
Non-Federal Register version, 10/4/2021
==========
Ohio v. Becerra, No. 1:21-cv-675 (S.D. Ohio, filed October 25, 2021)
Complaint
Motion for preliminary injunction, October 25, 2021
| 10/28/2021 | MINUTE ENTRY AND NOTATION ORDER: This civil action came before the Court for an informal conference by telephone pursuant to Local Rule 65 on 10/28/2021 at 4:30 p.m. Benjamin Flowers and Stephen Carney appeared on behalf of all Plaintiffs. Charlie Merritt and Michael Clendenen appeared on behalf of all Defendants. The parties jointly proposed a briefing schedule on Plaintiffs’ Motion for a Preliminary Injunction (Doc. 2 ) that the Court hereby ADOPTS. Accordingly, amicus briefs supporting the motion, if any, are due 11/15/2021. Defendants’ response in opposition to Plaintiffs’ motion is due 11/22/2021. Amicus briefs opposing the motion, if any, are due 11/29/2021. Plaintiffs’ reply memo is due 12/6/2021. If the Court determines oral argument will be useful, a hearing will be set for 12/7/2021. The parties represented to the Court that producing a complete administrative record would not be necessary or feasible in the time allotted to decide this motion. The parties SHALL jointly file a stipulation to that effect, explaining their reasoning, by 11/1/2021. The parties are otherwise instructed to provide their evidence as attachments to their briefing; the Court wishes to avoid an evidentiary hearing. The Court will rule expeditiously. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 10/28/2021. (Entered: 11/01/2021) |
States’ amicus, November 15, 2021
Ohio v Becerra states amicus 11 15
US opposition to preliminary injunction, November 22, 2021
National Family Planning amicus, November 29/30, 2021
Ohio Title X family planning amicus
California amicus, December 2, 2021
Ohio Title X California amicus 12 2
Ohio reply supporting preliminary injunction, December 3, 2021
Ohio Title X Ohio PI reply 12 3
Unopposed US motion for extension of time to answer, December 16, 2021
Ohio v Becerra unop xt answer 12 16
Order denying preliminary injunction, December 29, 2021
Ohio Title X order denying PI 12 29
Ohio notice of appeal, December 30, 2021
Ohio motion for injunction pending appeal, December 30, 2021
Sixth Circuit # 21-4235
| 01/03/2022 | NOTATION ORDER: This civil action is before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Motion for Injunction Pending Appeal. (Doc. 52 ). The Court considers substantially the same factors on a motion for injunction pending appeal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 62(d) as it does on a motion for a preliminary injunction under Rule 65. Accordingly, for the reasons fully developed in the Court’s Order denying a preliminary injunction, (Doc. 50 ), Plaintiffs’ Motion for Injunction Pending Appeal is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 1/3/2022. (rrs) (Entered: 01/03/2022) |
Ohio injunction pending appeal motion, January 4, 2022
Montana amicus supporting injunction pending appeal, January 12, 2022
California amicus, January 14, 2022
Planned Parenthood amicus, January 14, 2022
6C Planned Parenthood amicus 1 14
US opposition to injunction pending appeal, January 14, 2022
Ohio reply supporting injunction pending appeal, January 20, 2022
American Ass’n of Pro-Life Obstetricians amicus, with request, January 20, 2022
National Family Planning amicus, with request, January 21, 2022
6C Natl FP amicus request 1 21
[]
Joint motion to stay trial court proceedings, January 25, 2022
Order denying stay pending appeal, February 8, 2022
6C Ohio v. Becerra order denying stay 2 8
Appellants’ brief, February 22, 2022
Montana amicus, February 28, 2022
Americans United for Life amicus, March 1, 2022
6C Am United for Life amicus 3 1
US appellee brief, March 24/25, 2022
6C OH Title X US appellee br 3 25
US notice re grants, March 29, 2022
Planned Parenthood amicus, March 31, 2022
Plaintiffs’ request for judicial notice re grants, March 31, 2022
6C pltf rq judicial notice grants 3 31
California, New York et al amicus, March 31, 2022
National Family Planning & Reproductive Health amicus, March 31, 2022
Ohio reply brief, April 11, 2022
Oral argument, October 27, 2022
US letter re not using Title X funds for travel for abortions, November 10, 2022
Affordable Care Act Litigation 