Vaccines

Here are cases on the CMS health care worker vaccination mandate; the OSHA vaccination or test mandate; the federal contractor mandate (brought by States); and other vaccination mandate cases of importance  (including the Maine and New York cases, and some information on the Western Michigan case).  Also included are some cases about mask mandates.

Here is a link to a short-term calendar on vaccination mandate cases brought by anti-mandate States:

vaccination-mandate-cases-updated-12-2-21-am

============

The CMS health care worker vaccine mandate, November 5, 2021

86 Fed. Reg. 61,555 (Nov. 5, 2021)

2021-23831-1

Non Federal Register version, November 4, 2021

2021-23831

The OSHA vaccine mandate, November 5, 2021

86 Fed. Reg. 61,402 (Nov. 5, 2021)

2021-23643-1

Non Federal Register version, November 4, 2021

2021-23643

CMS frequently asked questions, November 2021

CMS Omnibus Staff Vax Requirements – External FAQ (508 Compliant)

========

CASES CHALLENGING THE CMS VACCINATION MANDATE

States challenging the CMS vaccination mandate in the Missouri (M), Louisiana (L), Texas (T), and Florida (F) cases

Alabama (L)

Alaska (M)

Arizona (L)

Arkansas (M)

Florida (F)

Georgia (L)

Idaho (L)

Indiana (L)

Iowa (M)

Kansas (M)

Louisiana (L)

Mississippi (L)

Missouri (M)

Montana (L)

Nebraska (M)

New Hampshire (M)

North Dakota (M)

Oklahoma (L)

South Carolina (L)

South Dakota (M)

Texas (T)

Utah (L)

West Virginia (L)

Wyoming (M)

========

The Missouri case against the CMS vaccine mandate

Missouri v. Biden, No. 4:21-cv-1329 (E.D. Mo., filed Nov. 10, 2021)

Complaint

107110094679

Motion for preliminary injunction, and memo in support with exhibits, November 12, 2021

107110098654

MO v CMS PI memo with exhibits

Motion to expedite, November 12, 2021

107110098686

McElvain entry of appearance, November 16, 2021

107110104469

US opposition to expediting, November 16, 2021

MO US expedite op 11 16

Reply supporting expediting, November 17, 2021

MO v CMS exped reply

11/17/2021 18 ELECTRONIC MINUTE ENTRY (no pdf attached) for proceedings held before District Judge Matthew T. Schelp: Attorneys Only Scheduling Conference held on 11/17/2021 via Zoom. Scheduling Order to follow. (proceedings started: 12:00 PM) (proceedings ended: 12:15 PM) (Appearance for Plaintiff: Dean John Sauer, Jesus Osete, James Cambell)(Appearance for Defendant: Joel McElvain) (BRP) (Entered: 11/17/2021)

Scheduling order, November 17, 2021

107110106048

Reliant amicus, November 21, 2021

MO v CMS Reliant amicus

US opposition to preliminary injunction, November 22, 2021

107110112510

States’ reply supporting preliminary injunction, November 23, 2021

107110117256

Order for preliminary injunction, November 29, 2021

107110120076

US notice of appeal, November 30, 2021

MO v CMS US notice of appeal 11 30

Motion for stay pending appeal, and memorandum, November 30, 2021

107110122824

107110122830

Eighth Circuit # 21-3725

US emergency motion for stay pending appeal, November 30, 2021

8C CMS emergency mo for stay pending appeal 11 30

Trial court order denying stay pending appeal, December 1, 2021

107110124763

Eighth Circuit order requesting response by 12/8, December 2, 2021

8C rq for response by 12 8

==========

The Louisiana case against the CMS vaccine mandate

Louisiana v. Becerra, No. 3:21-cv-3970 (W.D. La., filed Nov. 15, 2021)

Complaint

08916582275

Motion for preliminary injunction, with exhibits, November 15, 2021

Louisiana v. Becerra PI mo w xhib

Service and scheduling order, November 16, 2021

08916583860

Revised scheduling order, November 17, 2021

LA v CMS scheduling order 11 17

First Amended Complaint (adding Ohio and Kentucky), November 22, 2021

08916592336

Ohio/Kentucky joinder in preliminary injunction motion, November 22, 2021

08916592348

US opposition to preliminary injunction (attached to motion for leave to file excess pages), November 26/29, 2021

LA v CMS US mo leave exceed pages with PI op 11 26

States’ motion for expedited consideration, November 29, 2021

LA v CMS States mo xpd

Order granting expedited consideration, promising ruling by 12/5, November 29, 2021

08916597732

States’ reply supporting preliminary injunction, November 29/30, 2021

08916598501

Preliminary injunction, and order, November 30, 2021

08916599399

08916599415

Notice of appeal, December 1, 2021

08916600590

Motion for stay pending appeal, December 1, 2021

LA v CMS US mo stay pending appeal 12 1

Fifth Circuit # 21-30734

Order denying stay pending appeal, December 1, 2021

LA v CMS order denying stay pending appeal 12 1

=============

The Texas case against the CMS vaccine mandate

Texas v. Becerra, No. 2:21-cv-229 (N.D. Tex., filed Nov. 15, 2021)

Complaint

177114705871

Motion for TRO and preliminary injunction; memo; appendix, November 16, 2021

TX v CMS vm TRO PI mo 11 16

177114709657

TX v CMS vm TRO PI appendix 11 16

US status report, and corrected status report, November 17, 2021

TX v CMS US status report 1 11 17

TX v CMS US corrected status report 11 17

Scheduling order, November 17, 2021

TX v CMS vac sch order 11 17

Texas Republican Delegation amicus, November 23, 2021

[motion]

Texas Republican Delegation amicus 11 23

Texas Republican Delegation amended amicus, November 23, 2021

TRD amended amicus mo

Texas Republican Delegation amended amicus 11 23

US opposition to preliminary injunction, November 28, 2021

TX v CMS US PI op 11 28

Administrative record, November 28, 2021

TX v CMS admin record notice

TX v CMS admin record index

[]

TX v CMS admin record 2

[]

[]

TX v CMS admin record 5

TX v CMS admin record 6

TX v CMS admin record 7

11/29/2021 33 Notice of Hearing: Preliminary Hearing RESET for 12/2/2021 @ 09:00 AM in US Courthouse, Courtroom 1st Floor, 205 S. E. 5th Ave., Amarillo, TX 79101-1559 before Judge Matthew J. Kacsmaryk. (vls) (Entered: 11/29/2021)

Texas reply supporting preliminary injunction, November 30, 2021

177114738744

US motion to stay in light of nationwide preliminary injunction (LA), December 1, 2021

TX v CMS US mo stay 12 1

Texas opposition to stay, December 1, 2021

177114740878

US notice of additional authority (Florida), December 1, 2021

TX v CMS US notice new auth (FL) 12 1

Order deferring ruling on stay and requiring US answers to questions, December 1, 2021

TX v CMS order re stay, US explanations 12 1

[Hearing, 12/2]

=========

The Florida case against the CMS vaccine mandate

Florida v. D.H.H.S., No. 3:21-cv-2722 (N.D. Fla., filed Nov. 17, 2021)

Complaint

FL v CMS complaint

Motion for TRO/preliminary injunction, November 17, 2021

FL v CMS TRO PI mo 11 17

Florida notice of similar case, November 18, 2021

FL v CMS notice of similar case 11 18

[Darling v. Sacred Heart Health System, No. 3:21-cv-1787 (N.D. Fla., filed Oct. 27, 2021)

Complaint

Darling complaint 10 27

Motion and memo for TRO, October 28, 2021

Darling TRO mo

Darling TRO ms w xh

Scheduling order, November 1, 2021

Darling scheduling order 11 1

Defendants’ TRO opposition, November 3, 2021

Darling def TRO op 11 3

Plaintiffs’ reply supporting TRO, November 5, 2021

Darling reply supporting TRO 11 5

Plaintiffs’ supplemental authority (5C stay), November 9, 2021

Darling pltf supp auth (5C)

Order denying TRO and preliminary injunction, November 10, 2021

Darling order denying TRO and PI 11 10

]

Order denying TRO, November 20, 2021

FL v CMS order denying PI 11 20

Notice of appeal, November 23, 2021

7959253-0–90358

Emergency motion for injunction pending appeal, November 23, 2021

7959288-0–91293

Eleventh Circuit # 21-14098

Order denying stay, scheduling hearing, November 27, 2021

FL v CMS order denying stay and scheduling hearing 11 27

Joint motion to vacate briefing and hearing, November 28, 2021

FL v CMS joint mo vacate 11 28

Referral and Order, November 29, 2021

FL v CMS Referral and Order 11 29

Time-sensitive motion for injunction pending appeal, November 29, 2021

11C time sensitive ipa mo 11 29

Florida additional authority (Louisiana), December 1, 2021

11C FL v CMS addl auth LA 12 1

Order in aid of appeal, December 1, 2021

7970318-0–105354

12/02/2021 Public Communication: The court requests that the Appellees file a response to the motion for an injunction pending appeal by tomorrow, Friday, December 3, 2021 no later than Noon (12:00pm). [Entered: 12/02/2021 10:46 AM]

===========

CASES CHALLENGING THE OSHA VACCINATION OR TEST MANDATE

States challenging the OSHA vaccination mandate (Circuit filed in, by Circuit number)

Alabama (11)

Alaska (8)

Arizona (8)

Arkansas (8)

Florida (11)

Georgia (11)

Idaho (6)

Indiana (7)

Iowa (8)

Kansas (6)

Kentucky (6)

Louisiana (5)

Mississippi (5)

Missouri (8)

Montana (8)

Nebraska (8)

New Hampshire (8)

North Dakota (8)

Ohio (6)

Oklahoma (6)

South Carolina (5)

South Dakota (8)

Tennessee (6)

Texas (5)

Utah (5)

West Virginia (6)

Wyoming (8)

=========

Post-consolidation proceedings in the Sixth Circuit, No. 21-7000

AMA amicus, November 22, 2021

6C AMA amicus 11 22

Ohio petition for initial hearing en banc, November 22, 2021

6C Ohio initial en banc amicus pet 11 22

US motion for leave to file excess pages, November 23, 2021

6C US ext page limit 11 23

US emergency motion to dissolve stay, November 23, 2021

6C US emergency motion to dissolve stay 11 23

Small Business Ass’n of Michigan amicus, November 23, 2021

6C Small Business Assn MI amicus

Private Fifth Circuit petitioners’ motion to transfer to Fifth Circuit, November 23, 2021

6C private 5C parties motion to transfer to 5C 11 23

Job Creators Network opposition to dissolving stay, November 23, 2021

6C Job Creators Network op to dis stay

Bentkey motion to hold US motion to lift stay in abeyance, November 23, 2021

6C Bentkey mo to hold US motion to lift stay in abeyance

Constitutional Accountability Center amicus supporting lifting stay, November 23, 2021

6C CAC amicus supporting lifting stay

AMA amicus supporting lifting stay, November 23, 2021

6C AMA amicus supporting US mo vacate stay

Scheduling order, November 23, 2021

6C scheduling order 11 23

Private Fifth Circuit petitioners’ joinder in initial hearing en banc motion, November 24, 2021

6C 5C private petitioners joinder in iheb 11 24

Fabarc joinder re initial hearing en banc, November 24, 2021

6C Fabarc joinder in iheb

Asbury joinder re initial hearing en banc, November 24, 2021

6C Asbury joinder in iheb

US scheduling and rescheduling proposal, November 24, 2021

6C US scheduling proposal 11 24

States’ opposition to US rescheduling proposal, November 26, 2021

6C states op 11 26

26 business associations opposition to US rescheduling proposal, November 26 2021

6C 26 business assns op 11 26

Abadi motion to stay, November 29, 2021

6C Abadi emergency mo stay 11 29

Asbury/Southern Baptist opposition to rescheduling, November 29, 2021

6C Asbury op to resched 11 29

AFL-CIO motion to transfer to D.C. Circuit, November 29, 2021

6C AFL CIO mo transfer DC Cir 11 29

Burnett joinder in opposition to rescheduling, November 29, 2021

6C jointer in resched op 11 29

Bentkey opposition to rescheduling, November 29, 2021

6C Bentkey op resched

US opposition to initial hearing en banc, November 29, 2021

6C US op to iheb 11 29

Petitioners DTN Staffing (represented by Kris Kobach) reply supporting stay, November 29, 2021

6C DTN Staffing reply supporting stay 11 29

Former OSHA Administrators amicus, November 30, 2021

6c-former-osha-admins-amicus-11-30

Ohio motion to compel production of entire administrative record, November 30, 2021

6C Ohio mo compel complete record 11 30

National Ass’n of Home Builders opposition to lifting stay, November 30, 2021

6C NAHB op to lifting stay 11 30

MFA joinder in opposition to federal rescheduling proposal, November 30, 2021

6C MFA joinder in op

Doyle Equipment joinder in opposition to federal rescheduling proposal, November 30, 2021

6C Doyle Equipment joinder in op to rescheduling 11 30

Perez motion to intervene, November 30, 2021

6C Perez mo interv 11 30

Unions’ statement in support of lifting stay, November 30, 2021

6C unions support for lifting stay 11 30

Nat’l Employment Lawyers Ass’n amicus, November 30, 2021

6C Natl Employmernt Lawyers Assn amicus 11 30

American Public Health Ass’n amicus, November 30, 2021

6C APHA amicus 11 30

Betten Chevrolet motion to stay, November 30, 2021

6C Betten Chev op to lifting stay 11 30

Phillips Manufacturing motion to compel production of complete administrative record, December 1, 2021

6C Phillips Mfg motion to compel complete admin record 12 1

Abadi motion to separate, December 1, 2021

6C Abadi mo to separate 12 1

Natural Products Association joinder in opposition to rescheduling, December 1, 2021

6C Natural Products Assn joinder in resched op 12 1

=====

D.C. Circuit: the Republican National Committee petition against the OSHA mandate

Republican National Committee v. OSHA, No. 21-1215 (D.C. Cir., filed November 5, 2021)

Petition

DCC RNC petition

Clerk’s order, November 9, 2021

DCC RNC clerk’s order 11 9

Related cases, 21-1219, 21-1232

Transfer to Sixth Circuit, November 17, 2021

DCC transfer to 6C

now Sixth Circuit Case Nos. 21-4082/4094/4092

======

First Circuit: the Massachusetts Building Trades Council petition for review of the OSHA mandate

Massachusetts Building Trades Council v. OSHA, No. 21-1926 (1st Cir., filed November 9, 2021)

Petition

1C 21-1926_Documents Petition 11 9

now Sixth Circuit Case No. 21-4084

=======

Second Circuit: the SEIU petition against the OSHA mandate (as inadequate)

SEIU v. OSHA, No. 21-2800 (2d Cir., filed November 9, 2021)

Petition

2C 21-2800_Documents Petition 11 9

now Sixth Circuit Case No. 21-4095

=======

Third Circuit: the AFT petition for review of the OSHA mandate

AFT Pennsylvania v. OSHA, No. 21-3088 (3d Cir., filed November 10, 2021)

Petition

3C 21-3088_Documents Petition 11 10

now Sixth Circuit Case No. 21-4099

===================

Fourth Circuit: the Plumbers/Pipefitters petition for review of the OSHA mandate

United Ass’n of Plumbers and Pipefitters v. OSHA, No. 21-2262 (4th Cir., filed November 9, 2021)

Petition

4C 21-2262_Documents Petition 11 9

now Sixth Circuit Case No. 21-4089/4086

=======

Fifth Circuit: the Texas petition against the OSHA mandate

BST Holdings, LLC v. OSHA, No. 21-60845 (5th Cir., filed November 5, 2021)

Petition

21-60845_initial petition

Emergency motion for stay and to expedite, November 5, 2021

21-60845_motion and exhibits

Petitioners’ brief, November 5, 2021

21-60845_petitioners brief

Amended petition including Texas and other states, November 5, 2021

21-60845_amended petition including Texas

Stay, November 6, 2021

5C stay 11 6 21

11/06/2021 RESPONSE DUE to Motion for stay pending appeal filed by Petitioners Burnett Specialists, Choice Staffing, L.L.C., Staff Force, Incorporated, Leadingedge Personnel, Limited and HT Staffing, Limited in 21-60845 [9706583-2], Memo Supporting Document filed by Petitioner American Family Association, Incorporated in 21-60845 [9706058-2], Motion for stay pending appeal filed by Petitioners BST Holdings, L.L.C., RV Trosclair, L.L.C., Trosclair Airline, L.L.C., Trosclair Almonaster, L.L.C., Trosclair and Sons, L.L.C., Trosclair & Trosclair, Incorporated, Trosclair Carrollton, L.L.C., Trosclair Claiborne, L.L.C., Trosclair Donaldsonville, L.L.C., Trosclair Houma, L.L.C., Trosclair Judge Perez, L.L.C., Trosclair Lake Forest, L.L.C., Trosclair Morrison, L.L.C., Trosclair Paris, L.L.C., Trosclair Terry, L.L.C., Trosclair Williams, L.L.C., Mr. Ryan Dailey, Mr. Jasand Gamble, Mr. Christopher L. Jones, Mr. David John Loschen, Mr. Samuel Albert Reyna and Mr. Kip Stovall in 21-60845 [9706028-2] Response/Opposition due on 11/08/2021 by 5:00 PM [21-60845] (PAC) [Entered: 11/06/2021 12:03 PM]

Texas emergency motion for stay, November 7, 2021

5C TX emergency stay mo

Answers in Genesis withdrawal, November 8, 2021

5C Answers in Genesis wdwl

LeadingEdge motion, November 8, 2021

5C LeadingEdge motion

Scheduling order, November 8, 2021

5C 2d sched order

The Daily Wire amicus, November 8, 2021

5C The Daily Wire amicus

US response to stay motion, November 8, 2021

5C US stay response 11 8

American Family Ass’n joinder in motions for stay, November 8, 2021

5C AFA joinder

New Civil Liberties Alliance amicus, November 9, 2021

5C New Civil Liberties Alliance amicus

Burnett Specialists joinder in motions for stay, November 9, 2021

5C joinder in T

Petitioners’ reply supporting stay, November 9, 2021

5C pet stay reply

BST petitioners’ reply supporting stay, November 9, 2021

5C pet BST stay reply

[]

US response to Texas motion for stay, November 10, 2021

5C US response TX mo stay 11 10

Texas reply supporting stay, November 11, 2021

5C TX stay reply

New Civil Liberties Alliance amicus, November 11, 2021

5C NCLA amicus

AMA amicus, November 11, 2021

5C AMA amicus

Stay opinion, November 12, 2021

5C stay opinion 11 12

Transfer to Sixth Circuit, November 17, 2021

5C transfer to 6C 11 17

now Sixth Circuit Case No. 21-4080

=========

Sixth Circuit: the Kentucky petition against the OSHA mandate

Commonwealth of Kentucky v. OSHA, No. 21-4031 (6th Cir., filed November 5, 2021)

Petition

21-4031_initial pleadings

Emergency motion for stay, November 5, 2021

21-4031_Kentucky v. OSHA motion for stay

Letter scheduling response and reply, November 7, 2021

6C letter scheduling

US letter re multidistrict litigation, November 8, 2021

6C US letter re multi district

related cases? 21-4027, 21-4028, 21-4032, and 21-4033

Michigan legislators’ amicus, November 12, 2021

6C Michigan leg amicus

Idaho legislators’ intervention, November 12, 2021

6C Idaho Leg interv

US opposition to stay, November 15, 2021

6C US stay op

[AMA amicus]

US notice to multidistrict panel, November 16, 2021

6C US notice to multidistrict panel 11 16

Multidistrict panel order, November 16, 2021

MCP 165 order 6C

Buckeye Institute petition for initial hearing en banc, November 17, 2021 (in 21-4028)

6C Buckeye Inst initial en banc rq

Letter requesting response from parties, November 17, 2021

6C letter requesting response

Asbury petition for initial hearing en banc, November 17, 2021

6C Asbury Baptist pet initial ebh 11 17

Ohio motion for excess pages for reply, November 18, 2021

6C OH mo excess pages

Bentkey petition for initial hearing en banc, November 18, 2021 (in 21-4027)

6C Bentkey pet initial ebh 11 18

Letter requesting consolidated response from parties 11/30, November 18, 2021 (in 21-4027, -4028, -4033)

6C letter directing 1 response to iheb 11 18

Asbury reply supporting stay, November 19, 2021

6C Asbury stay reply 11 19

Letter saying Ohio reply need not be filed, November 19, 2021

6C letter saying no need for Ohio reply 11 19

Initial case management order in 21-7000, November 21, 2021

6C initial case management order 11 21

Sixth Circuit Case Nos. 21-4027/4028/4031/4032/4033

AMA amicus, November 22, 2021

6C AMA amicus 11 22

Ohio petition for initial hearing en banc, November 22, 2021

6C Ohio initial en banc amicus pet 11 22

US motion for leave to file excess pages, November 23, 2021

6C US ext page limit 11 23

US emergency motion to dissolve stay, November 23, 2021

6C US emergency motion to dissolve stay 11 23

===========

Seventh Circuit: the Indiana petition against the OSHA mandate

Indiana v. OSHA, No. 21-3066 (7th Cir., filed November 5, 2021)

Petition

7C Indiana v. OSHA petition

Motion for stay, November 5, 2021

7C stay mo 11 5

US letter re multidistrict litigation, November 8, 2021

7C US letter re multidistrict

Circuit’s consolidation question, November 8, 2021

7C consol q

Order, November 9, 2021

7C order 11 9

Indiana statement of position, November 10, 2021

7C IN statement of position re 5C stay 11 10

US opposition to stay, November 12, 2021

7C US stay op

related case, 21-3058

AMA amicus, November 18, 2021

7C AMA amicus as filed 11 18

Wisconsin Manufacturers & Commerce amicus (in 21-3058), November 18, 2021

7C Wisc Ma and C amicus

Transfer order to Sixth Circuit, November 18, 2021

7C transfer to 6C

now Sixth Circuit Case Nos. 21-4091/4090

=======

Eighth Circuit: the Missouri petition against the OSHA mandate

Missouri v. Biden, No. 21-3494 (8th Cir., filed November 5, 2021)

Petition

8C anti OSHA initiating documents

Emergency motion for stay, November 5, 2021

21-3494_emergency stay mo

Petitioners’ motion to expedite, November 8, 2021

8C pet mo expedite

US letter re multidistrict litigation, November 8, 2021

8C US letter re multi district

Scheduling order, November 10, 2021

8C scheduling order

Related cases, 21-3491, 21-3540

US stay opposition, November 12, 2021

8C US stay op

Petitioners’ reply to US response, November 15, 2021

8C reply supporting stay 11 15

Transfer to Sixth Circuit, November 18, 2021

8C transfer to 6C

now Sixth Circuit Case Nos. 21-4093/4088/4101/4096

========

Ninth Circuit: the National Ass’n of Broadcast Employees and Technicians petition for review of the OSHA mandate

National Ass’n of Broadcast Employees and Technicians v. OSHA, No. 21-71370 (9th Cir., filed November 9, 2021)

Petition

9C 21-71370_Documents

now Sixth Circuit Case Nos. 21-4087/4103/4085

=========

Tenth Circuit: the Denver Newspaper Guild petition for review of the OSHA mandate

Denver Newspaper Guild v. OSHA, No. 21-9592 (10th Cir., filed November 15, 2021)

Petition

10C petition

now Sixth Circuit Case No. 21-4100

=============

Eleventh Circuit: the Florida petition against the OSHA mandate

Florida v. Biden, No. 21-13866 (11th Cir., filed November 5, 2021)

Petition

21-13866_initial filings

US letter re multidistrict litigation, November 8, 2021

11C US letter re multidistrict

Florida motion for stay, November 8, 2021

11C FL mo stay 11 8

11/09/2021 Parties that wish to file a response to the motion to stay pending appeal filed on November 8, 2021, must do so no later than Friday, November 12, 2021. Parties wanting to reply to responses filed must do so no later than Tuesday, November 16, 2021. [Entered: 11/09/2021 02:51 PM]

US opposition to stay, November 12, 2021

11C US stay op 11 12

related cases 21-13900, 21-13910

Florida stay reply, November 16, 2021

11C FL stay reply 11 16

now Sixth Circuit Case Nos. 21-4097/4102/4083

==============

Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation

MCP No. 7, November 16, 2021

Notice to US Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation MCP No. 7

========

CASES CHALLENGING THE FEDERAL VACCINATION OR TEST MANDATE FOR CONTRACTORS

Brnovich v. Biden, No. 2:21-cv-1568 (D. Ariz.)

Florida v. Nelson, No. 8:21-cv-2524 (M.D. Fla.)

Georgia v. Biden, No. 1:21-cv-163 (S.D. Ga.)

Kentucky v. Biden, No. 3:21-cv-55 (E.D. Ky.)

Missouri v. Biden, No. 4:21-cv-1300 (E.D. Mo.)

Oklahoma v. Biden, No. 5:21-cv-1069 (W.D. Okla.)

Texas v. Biden, No. 3:21-cv-309 (S.D. Tex.)

=========

The Arizona case against the federal vaccine mandate

Brnovich v. Biden, No. 2:21-cv-1568 (D. Ariz., filed Sept. 14, 2021)

Complaint

AZ anti undoc complaint

First amended complaint, October 22, 2021

merged_84562_-1-1636308880

TRO/preliminary injunction papers, October 22, 2021

merged_59213_-1-1636308990

[]

US response, November 4, 2021

AZ US TRO response 11 4

Court’s minutes, November 10, 2021

B v B court’s minutes 11 10

Second amended complaint, November 19, 2021

merged_81753_-1-1637425837

Third motion for preliminary injunction, November 19, 2021

merged_19925_-1-1637426122

Request to consolidate PI and trial on the merits, November 19, 2021

merged_78210_-1-1637426211

Plaintiffs’ supplemental authority (Missouri v. Biden), November 29, 2021

AZ supp auth MO 11 29

Plaintiffs’ supplemental authority (Louisiana), November 30, 2021

AZ contr supp auth LA 11 30

[US response 12/3; AZ reply, 12/8]

========

The Florida case against the Federal contractor mandate

Florida v. Nelson, No. 8:21-cv-2524 (M.D. Fla., filed October 28, 2021)

Complaint

047123627394

Motion/memo/exhibits for preliminary injunction, November 2, 2021

FL v Nelson PI mo w exhib

Parties’ scheduling proposal, November 5, 2021

FL v Nelson parties scheduling proposal

Scheduling order, November 8, 2021

FL v. Nelson scheduling order

US opposition to preliminary injunction, November 17, 2021

FL contractor US PI op 11 17

US notice to clarify, November 20, 2021

US notice to clarify 11 20

Amended complaint, November 29, 2021

047123735102-1

Florida reply supporting preliminary injunction, November 29, 2021

FL contrc PI reply and amendment

[Hearing, 12/7]

========

The Georgia case against the federal contractor vaccine mandate

Georgia v. Biden, No. 1:21-cv-163 (S.D. Ga., filed Oct. 29, 2021)

Complaint

merged_73347_-1-1636668738

Motion for preliminary injunction, November 5, 2021

merged_82360_-1-1636918253

Georgia emergency motion to expedite, November 8, 2021

merged_98877_-1-1636918359

US opposition to expediting, November 10, 2021

merged_23359_-1-1636918458

11/12/2021 41 TEXT ORDER granting in part Plaintiffs’ 23 Emergency Motion to Expedite Briefing Schedule and Request for Hearing. Therefore, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendants’ response to Plaintiffs’ 19 Motion for Preliminary Injunction shall be filed by close of business on November 19, 2021, and Plaintiffs’ Reply to Response shall be filed by close of business on November 26, 2021. Defendants may file a Surreply by close of business on December 1, 2021, and this Court will hold a hearing on December 3, 2021. Each party shall file a witness and exhibit list, including any joint exhibit list, by close of business on November 30, 2021, and the parties shall exchange, but not file, exhibits on or before November 30, 2021. The parties are reminded that all exhibits shall only be presented in electronic form. Signed by District Judge R. Stan Baker on November 12, 2021. (pmh) (Entered: 11/12/2021)

US emergency motion re scheduling, November 17, 2021

Georgia contractor US emergency mo re sched

Plaintiffs’ opposition to emergency motion, November 18, 2021

Georgia contractor pltf op re resched 11 18

Associated Builders & Contractors motion to intervene and memo in support, November 18, 2021

Georgia ABC interv mo

Georgia ABC interv ms

ABC motion for preliminary injunction, November 18, 2021

Georgia ABC PI mo

11/18/2021 51 TEXT ORDER granting in part Defendants’ 46 Emergency Motion to Clarify Scheduling Order in Light of Plaintiffs’ Intent to File Amended Complaint and Revised Preliminary Injunction Motion. As indicated during the telephonic hearing held on 11/18/2021, it is ORDERED that Plaintiffs shall file any amended complaint and any amended motion for preliminary injunction by midnight on November 19, 2021. Defendants’ Response shall be filed by midnight on November 26, 2021. Plaintiffs may file a Reply by midnight on November 30, 2021. This Court will hold a hearing on Plaintiffs’ request for a preliminary injunction on December 3, 2021. Each party shall file a witness and exhibit list, including any joint exhibit list, by close of business on November 30, 2021, and the parties shall exchange, but not file, exhibits on or before November 30, 2021. The parties are reminded that all exhibits shall only be presented in electronic form. Entered by District Judge R. Stan Baker on November 18, 2021. (jrb) Modified on 11/18/2021 to edit text (en). (Entered: 11/18/2021)

Minute entry, November 18, 2021

Georgia contractor minute entry 11 18

11/19/2021 53 TEXT ORDER: It is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiffs and Defendants shall file responses to 48 MOTION to Intervene and Defendants shall file a response to 50 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction, all by midnight on November 26, 2021. Proposed Intervenors may file a reply to those responses by midnight on November 30, 2021. This Court will hold a hearing on said motions in conjunction with the previously-scheduled hearing on Plaintiffs’ request for injunctive relief on December 3, 2021. Proposed Intervenors shall file with the Court any witness and/or exhibit list, including any joint exhibit list, by close of business on November 30, 2021, and Proposed Intervenors shall exchange with Plaintiffs and Defendants, but not file, any exhibits on or before November 30, 2021. All exhibits shall only be presented in electronic form. Proposed Intervenors shall email Judge Baker’s courtroom deputy clerk, by close of business on November 26, 2021, a list of all individuals they request to have attend the hearing in person. Entered by District Judge R. Stan Baker on November 19, 2021. (jrb) Modified on 11/19/2021 (jrb). (Entered: 11/19/2021)

Amended complaint, November 19, 2021

merged_20077_-1-1637426487

Amended motion for preliminary injunction, November 19, 2021

merged_88714_-1-1637426820

US response to motion to intervene, November 26, 2021

GA contractor US op to interv 11 26

US opposition to motions for preliminary injunction, November 26, 2021

merged_31520_-1-1638033317

AMA amicus, November 29, 2021

GA contr AMA amicus 11 29

States’s reply supporting preliminary injunction, November 30, 2021

merged_89923_-1-1638334474

AGC reply supporting preliminary injunction, November 30, 2021

merged_28292_-1-1638334195

AGC reply supporting its intervention, November 30, 2021

merged_66061_-1-1638334608

[Hearing, 12/3]

=======

The Kentucky case against the federal vaccine mandate

Kentucky v. Biden, No. 3:21-cv-55 (E.D. Ky., filed November 4, 2021)

Complaint

KY v Biden complaint

Kentucky motion for TRO and preliminary injunction, with exhibits, November 8, 2021

merged_41651_-1-1636917645

Court’s minutes and scheduling order, November 9, 2021

Kentucky vaccin minutes and scheduling order

Order for motions hearing, November 10, 2021

Kentucky order for motion hearing

US opposition, November 16, 2021

KY v Biden US opposition 11 16

Kentucky reply, November 17, 2021

Kentucky reply 11 17

Minute entry, November 18, 2021

KY contractor minute entry 11 18

Opinion and order granting preliminary injunction, November 30, 2021

KY contr PI op and order 11 30

========

The Missouri case against the federal vaccine mandate

Missouri v. Biden, No. 4:21-cv-1300 (E.D. Mo., filed October 29, 2021)

Complaint

MO v B complaint

Motion for preliminary injunction, with memo and exhibits, November 4, 2021

107110087467

MO v Biden PI memo and exhibits

Motion to expedite, November 9, 2021

MO mo expedite

US opposition to expediting, November 10, 2021

US op expedite

Missouri reply supporting expediting, November 11, 2021

MO expedite reply

US opposition to motion for preliminary injunction, November 18, 2021

MO contractor US PI op 11 18

Missouri reply supporting preliminary injunction, November 22, 2021

MO contractor MO PI reply 11 22

11/23/2021 24 Docket Text ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that an Attorney’s Only Status Conference is set for November 24, 2021 at 9:00 am via zoom.(Join zoomgov.com and enter the ID and password: Meeting ID: 160 599 0218 Password: 346672 ) (Attorneys-Only Conference set for 11/24/2021 09:00 AM in Zoom Video Conference before Magistrate Judge David D. Noce.) Signed by Magistrate Judge David D. Noce on 11/23/21. (KJS) (Entered: 11/23/2021

Scheduling order, November 24, 2021

MO contractor scheduling order 11 24

==========

Oklahoma v. Biden, No. 5:21-cv-1069 (W.D. Okla., filed Nov. 4, 2021)

Complaint

merged_66280_-1-1636668291

TRO motion, November 15, 2021

OK contractor TRO mo 11 15

==============

Texas v. Biden, No. 3:21-cv-309 (S.D. Tex., filed Oct. 29, 2021)

Complaint

Texas v Biden complaint 10 29

Motion for TRO, November 15, 2021

TX contr TRO mo

11/16/2021 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Jeffrey V Brown. MOTION HEARING held on 11/16/2021. Taken under advisement. Brief due by 11/22/2021. Reply soon after. Appearances:Brad Rosenburg. Daniel David Hu, Kristin Alyssa Taylor, Christopher D. Hilton, Halie Elizabeth Daniels, Amy Snow Hilton.(Court Reporter: Laura Wells), filed.(GeorgeCardenas, 4) (Entered: 11/16/2021)

US opposition to TRO motion, November 22, 2021

TX contr US op TRO 11 22

Texas reply supporting TRO, November 29, 2021

179139571537

Notice of hearing, December 1, 2021

179139581060

[Hearing, 12/3]

=============

Two federal employee vaccine cases

Costin v. Biden, No. 1:21-cv-2484 (D. D.C., filed September 23, 2021)

Complaint

Costin v. Biden complaint

xxx

Church v. Biden, No. 1:21-cv-2815 (D. D.C., filed October 24, 2021)

Complaint, with attachments

Church complaint

[]

Opinion, November 8, 2021

Church opinion

=======

A Texas case by an NLRB lawyer against the President

Foley v. Biden, No. 4:21-cv-1098 (N.D. Tex., filed Sept. 29, 2021)

[]

Order denying preliminary injunction, October 6, 2021

177114605909

Plaintiff’s motion to include additional defendants, October 8, 2021

Foley addl def mo

Plaintiff’s response to Court’s 10/6 order, October 13, 2021

Foley pltf response

US response to motion to include additional defendants, October 29, 2021

Foley US response re amend

US request for extension of time to answer, November 22, 2021

Foley US xt rq 11 22

Plaintiffs’ response re extension of time to answer, November 23, 2021

177114728987

US reply supporting extension of time, November 24, 2021

177114729375

Order, November 29, 2021

177114733351

========

Florida cases against the federal vaccine mandate

Doe v. Austin, No. 3:21-cv-1211 (N.D. Fla., filed Oct. 6, 2021)

[]

11/03/2021 44 Minute Entry for proceedings held before JUDGE ALLEN C WINSOR:Telephonic Motion Hearing held on 11/3/2021 re 3 Emergency MOTION for Declaratory Judgment and 10 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order – 9:04 a.m. to 11:25 a.m. – Brandon Johnson and Irbrhim Reyes present for the Plaintiffs and Drew Carmichael present for the defendants – arguments presented by both sides – written order to follow (Court Reporter Lisa Snyder (USDC-Tallahassee)) (tss) (Entered: 11/04/2021)

Navy Seal 1 v. Biden, No. 8:21-cv-2429 (M.D. Fla., filed October 15, 2021)

Complaint

Navy Seal 1 complaint

[]

Scheduling order, October 18, 2021

047123590047

[]

Order, November 22, 2021

047123718580

=============

The Houston Methodist Hospital vaccine case

Bridges v. Houston Methodist Hospital, ; No. 4:21-cv-1774 (S.D. Tex.)

Notice of removal, including state court complaint, June 1, 2021

Bridges notice of removal 6 1 21

Plaintiffs’ motion for TRO, June 4, 2021

Bridges pltf TRO mo 6 4

Plaintiffs’ amended motion for TRO, June 4, 2021

Bridges pltf amended TRO mo

Order denying TRO, June 4, 2021

Bridges order denying TRO 6 4

Houston Memorial motion to dismiss, June 8, 2021

Houston Memorial motion to dismiss 6 8 21

Amended complaint, June 10, 2021

Bridges amended complaint 6 10

Opposition to motion to dismiss, June 10, 2021

Bridges op dism 6 10

Dismissal order, June 12, 2021

Bridges dismissal order 6 12 21

Notice of appeal, June 14, 2021

Bridges notice of appeal 6 14

Fifth Circuit # 21-20311

Appellants’ opening brief, November 15, 2021

5C Bridges OB

=====

The Indiana University vaccine case

Klaassen v. Trustees of Indiana University, No. 1:21-cv-238 (N.D. Ind., filed June 21, 2021)

Complaint

Klaassen complaint

[]

Opinion and Order, July 18, 2021

Klaassen opinion and order denying pi

Seventh Circuit # 21-2326

Trial court order denying injunction pending appeal, July 21, 2021

Klaassen order denying ipa

Emergency motion for injunction pending appeal, July 23, 2021

7C Klaassen plit emergency mo ipa

Scheduling order, July 25, 2021

7C Klaassen scheduling order

IU opposition to injunction pending appeal, July 27, 2021

7C Klaassen ipa op

Plaintiffs’ reply supporting injunction pending appeal, July 30, 2021

7C Klaassen ipa reply

Seventh Circuit order denying injunction pending appeal, August 2, 2021

7C Klaassen order

Supreme Court emergency motion for injunction, plus appendix, No. 21A15, filed August 6, 2021

20210806095541542_IU VAX SCOTUS writ of inj app FINAL

20210806095625645_IU Vax Appendix Final for Filing

Physicians for Informed Consent amicus, August 10, 2021

20210810123328658_PIC Amicus Brief for SCOTUS in Klaassen case — FINAL

Aug 12 2021 Application (21A15) denied by Justice Barrett.

IU motion to dismiss appeal, August 27, 2021

7C IU mo dism appeal 8 27

Order requesting response, August 30, 2021

7C order requesting response 8 30

Plaintiffs’ opposition to dismissing appeal, September 8, 2021

7C pltf op to dism appeal

Order denying motion to dismiss appeal, September 10, 2021

7C order denying dism

Plaintiffs’ motion to stay trial court proceedings, September 16, 2021

4528658-0–28004

Klaassen reply brief, November 17, 2021

7C Klaassen RB

Order re appellees’ jurisdictional statement, November 17, 2021

7C order re jurisD statement 11 17

=====

The Western Michigan athletics vaccine mandate religious exemption case

Dahl v. Board of Trustees of Western Michigan University, No. 1:21-cv-757 (W.D. Mich., filed August 30, 2021)

[]

TRO order, August 31, 2021

09916240668

[]

Preliminary injunction, September 13, 2021

09916250769

[]

Sixth Circuit # 21-2945

[]

Order denying stay, October 7, 2021

6C order denying WMU stay

[]

Proposed consent judgment, November 15, 2021

09916310215

=======

The New York hospitals vaccine mandate religious exemption cases

We the Patriots USA, Inc. v. Hochul, No. 1:21-cv-4954 (E.D. N.Y.)

Complaint, September 2, 2021

[]

09/12/2021 ORDER denying 6 Motion for TRO; denying 6 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. So Ordered by Judge William F. Kuntz, II on 9/12/2021. (Kuntz, William) (Entered: 09/12/2021)

Second  Circuit # 21-2179

[]

Dr. A v. Hochul, No. 1:21-cv-1009 (N.D. N.Y.)

Complaint, September 13, 2021

Dr. A complaint

TRO motion, September 13, 2021

Dr. A TRO rq

McHale declaration, September 13, 2021

12515941992

TRO, September 14, 2021

12515942790-1

Order extending TRO and cancelling hearing, September 20, 2021

12515949147

New York opposition, with first of about 50 attachments, September 22, 2021

12515952877

12515952827

Preliminary injunction, October 12, 2021

12515970833

Notice of appeal, October 13, 2021

12515973563

Second Circuit # 21-2566

Scheduling letter, October 14, 2021

2C scheduling letter

Appellants’ brief, October 18, 2021

2C NY OB

Second Circuit letter to counsel, October 19, 2021

2C letter to counsel

Greater New York Hospital Ass’n amicus, October 20, 2021

2C Greater NY Hosp amicus

Appellees’ brief, October 22, 2021

2C Dr A respondent brief

NY reply brief, October 25, 2021

2C NY reply brief

[Oral argument scheduled 10/27]

Certified order, October 29, 2021

2C order 10 29

Opinion, November 4, 2021

2C opinion 11 4

L.A. County Dep’t of Public Health, COVID-19 Vaccine and Fetal Cell Lines (Apr. 20, 2021), cited and relied on in the Second Circuit opinion

VaccineDevelopment_FetalCellLines

Order vacating preliminary injunction, November 5, 2021

Order vacating PI 11 5

Clarification order, November 12, 2021

2C clarification order 11 12

We The Patriots emergency application, No. 21A125

20211102143010542_WTP_Emergency Application For Stay_final

Nov 03 2021 Response to application (21A125) requested by Justice Sotomayor, due Wednesday, November 10, by 4 p.m.

Americans United for Separation of Church and State amicus, November 9, 2021

20211109093306506_Americans United et al Supreme Court amicus motion with brief — We the Patriots v Hochul — PDFA

New York response, November 10, 2021

20211110135007256_21A125 NY Br in Opposition

American Public Health Ass’n amicus, November 10, 2021

20211110205927191_2021.11.06 – Vaccine Mandates Public Health Scholars MOTION FINAL

Dr. A emergency application, November 12, 2021

20211112101633521_Dr. A v. Hochul – Emergency Application for Injunction FINAL

Nov 12 2021 Response to application (21A145) requested by Justice Sotomayor, due Tuesday, November 16, by 4 p.m.

New York response, November 16, 2021

20211116150752855_21A145 Br in Opposition

Former federal employees amicus, November 16, 2021

20211116101737424_Dr. A. v. Hochul_Motion and Proposed Amici Brief

Dr. A reply, November 18, 2021

20211117092141384_Dr. A Reply Brief and Addendum FINAL

John Doe 1 amicus, November 18, 2021

20211118133504588_Brief – Amicus John Doe 1

Letter from applicants, November 23, 2021

20211123141039182_Dr. A Letter from Applicants 11.23.21 FINAL

======

The New York City employee vaccine mandate case

[]

Maniscalco emergency application, No. 21A50, filed September 30, 2021

20210930135258574_Maniscalco v NYC Dept of Education – Emergency Application

Oct 01 2021 Application (21A50) denied by Justice Sotomayor.

=====

The Maine vaccine case

Jane Does 1-1000 v. Mills, No. 1:21-cv-242 (D. Maine)

Complaint, August 25, 2021

Jane Does complaint

TRO motion, August 25, 2021

TRO motion

State’s opposition to TRO, September 15, 2021

State TRO op

[Other oppositions]

Reply supporting TRO, September 17, 2021

[]

Order denying TRO and preliminary injunction, October 13, 2021

Order denying PI

First Circuit # 21-1826

[]

Jane Does v. Mills, No. 21A83, filed October 15, 2021

20211015163843276_Petition – Writ of Injunction Pending Appeal

Oct 19 2021 Application (21A83) denied by Justice Breyer. The application is denied without prejudice to applicants filing a new application after the Court of Appeals issues a decision on the merits of the appeal, or if the Court of Appeals does not issue a decision by October 29, 2021.

Opinion, October 19, 2021

1C opinion

Jane Does v. Mills, No. 21A90, filed October 20, 2021

20211020152710123_Application – Emergency Writ of Injunction Pending Cert FINAL

Oct 20 2021 Response to application (21A90) requested by Justice Breyer, due Monday, October 25, by noon.

Religious organizations amicus, October 22, 2021

20211022094924850_AU et al amicus motion with brief — Does v Mills — PDFA

State respondents’ opposition, October 25, 2021

20211025114816246_Doe v. Mills SD Oppn to Application 10 25 21

Provider respondents’ opposition, October 25, 2021

20211025111923898_2021-10-25 Provider Respondents Opposition to Emergency Application for Writ of Injunction

Becket Fund amicus, October 25, 2021

20211025201136751_Does v. Mills amicus brief _ Final

Plaintiffs’ reply, October 27, 2021

20211027075415906_Reply – Support Injunction Pending Cert Petition

Public Health Organizations amicus, October 28, 2021

20211028141652778_2021.10.28 – Vaccine Mandates Public Health Scholars

Order, concurrence, dissent, October 29, 2021

21a90_6j37

Petition for certiorari, No. 21-717, November [], 2021

20211111134412809_Petition

Petitioners’ motion to expedite, November 17, 2021

20211117133641192_Motion – Expedite Consideration of Cert Petition

Plaintiffs’ motion to stay trial court proceedings, November 19, 2021

Does motion to stay 11 19

Maine notice re vaccination rules, November 19, 2021

Does Maine notice re vaccination regs

Procedural order, November 19, 2021

Does procedural order 11 19

Maine opposition to motion to expedite cert, November 22, 2021

20211122163343019_Doe v. Mills Oppn M. Expedite 11 22 21 FINAL

Maine request for extension of time, November 22, 2021

20211122163535347_Does v. Mills – Clerk extension request 11 22 21

Private respondents’ opposition to motion to expedite cert, November 23, 2021

20211123150616693_Response to Motion to Expedite

Private respondents’ request for extension of time, November 23, 2021

20211123150934644_2021-11-23 COR to Supreme Court

Nov 24 2021 The motions to extend the time to file responses are denied

Reply supporting expediting, November 24, 2021

20211124162157685_Memo – Reply in Support of Motion to Expedite

======

A Montana case about the Montana statute prohibiting vaccination mandates

Montana Medical Ass’n v. Knudsen, No. 9:21-cv-108 (D. Mont., filed Sept. 22, 2021)

Complaint

Montana Medical Assn v Knudsen complaint

Motion to dismiss, and memo, October 21, 2021

MMA Mont mo dism 10 21

MMA Mont ms dism 10 21

10/25/2021 9 TEXT ORDER re 7 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction filed by Laurie Esau, Austin Knudsen: IT IS ORDERED there will be an abbreviated briefing schedule for this motion as follows: Responses due by 11/1/2021. Replies due by 11/8/2021. Signed by Judge Donald W. Molloy on 10/25/2021. (dle) (Entered: 10/25/2021)

Montana Nurses Ass’n motion to intervene as plaintiff, and memo, October 29, 2021

MMA Mont Montana Nurses interv mo

MMA Mont Montana Nurses interv ms

Plaintiffs’ opposition to motion to dismiss, November 1, 2021

MMA Mont MMA op mo dism 11 1

First amended complaint, November 1, 2021

MMA Mont 1st am c 11 1

11/02/2021 15 ORDER re 14 Amended Complaint: A response to the First Amended Complaint is due on or before 11/10/2021. If a second motion to dismiss is filed, Plaintiffs shall have until 11/17/2021 to respond and Defendants will have until 11/24/2021 to file a reply, if any. 7 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction filed by Laurie Esau, Austin Knudsen is DENIED as MOOT. Signed by Judge Donald W. Molloy on 11/2/2021. (dle) (Entered: 11/02/2021)

Defendants’ motion, memo, and affidavits supporting extension of time to respond, November 3, 2021

MMA Mont xt mo 11 3

MMA Mont xt memo

MMA Mont xt af 11 3

Order denying motion for extension of time, November 4, 2021

MMA Mont order denying xt

Motion to dismiss amended complaint, and memo, November 10, 2021

MMA Mont mo dism am c 11 10

MMA Mont ms dism am c 11 10

Montana opposition to motion to intervene, November 12, 2021

MMA Mont Mont op interv 11 12

Plaintiffs’ opposition to motion to dismiss amended complaint, November 17, 2021

MMA pltf op 2d dism

Montana Nurses Ass’n reply supporting intervention, November 23, 2021

MMA nurses interv reply

======

A South Carolina vaccine mandate case

Bauer v. Summey, No. 2:21-cv-2952 (D. S.C.); Gdovecak v. Tecklenburg, No. 2:21-cv-3137 (D. S.C.); Tucker v. Johnson, No. 2:21-cv-3178 (D. S.C.); Herndon v. Walz, No. 2:21-cv-3192 (D. S.C.)

[]

Order, October 21, 2021

163112309459-1

===========

A Washington State vaccine mandate case

Wise v. Inslee, No. 2:21-cv-288 (E.D. Wash.)

[]

Order, October 25, 2021

19514152448

======

A case between parents about vaccines

Burch v. Lipscomb, NO. 2021-CA-0614-ME (Ky. App., Nov. 19, 2021)

Burch v. Lipscomb

==============

A San Diego schools vaccine mandate case

Doe v. San Diego Unified School Dist., No. 3:21-cv-1809 (S.D. Cal., filed October 22, 2021)

Order denying TRO, November 18, 2021

16063751-0–15999

[]

Appellate stay, November 28, 2021

9C Doe order 11 28

=======

An Illinois hospital vaccine mandate case

Doe 1 v. Northshore University Healthsystem, No. 1:21-cv-5683 (N.D. Ill., filed Oct. 25, 2021)

[]

Order denying preliminary injunction, November 30, 2021

Doe 1 v Northshore PI denial 11 30

========

EEOC guidance on vaccine mandates, October 25, 2021

EEOC vaccine guidance 10 25 21

EEOC guidance on religious discrimination, January 15, 2021

EEOC religious discrimination guidance 1 15 21

=======

A California prison guards vaccine mandate case

Plata v. Newsom, No. 4:01-cv-1351 (N.D. Cal.)

[]

Order re mandatory vaccinations, September 27, 2021

Plata v. Newsom order re mandatory vac 9 27

[]

Ninth Circuit # 21-16696

[]

Order setting deadline for mandatory vaccinations, October 27, 2021

Plata v. Newsom Order Setting D 10 27

[]

Order denying stay pending appeal, November 17, 2021

Plata v. Newsom order denying stay pending appeal 11 17

Defendants’ emergency motion for stay, November 17, 2021

9C def emergency stay mo 11 17

Plaintiffs’ request for additional time to respond, November 19, 2021

9C pltf rq addl time respond 11 19

Clerk’s order denying extension and setting schedule, November 19, 2021

9C sched 11 19

Receiver’s response to emergency motion for stay, November 23, 2021

9C receiver’s response 11 23

Plaintiffs’ response to emergency motion for stay, November 23, 2021

9C plaintiffs response 11 23

California reply supporting stay, November 26, 2021

9C def stay reply 11 26

Ninth Circuit stay order, November 26, 2021

9C order for stay 11 26

======

Alaska Administrative Order 325, November 2, 2021

11.02.21-Administrative-Order-325-Rejecting-Federal-Overreach

========

A Florida schools mask mandate case

Hayes v. DeSantis, No. 1:21-cv-22863 (S.D. Fla., filed August 6, 2021)

[]

[]

Order denying preliminary injunction, September 15, 2021

Hayes order denying PI

====

The Texas schools mask mandate case

A.T as parent and next friend of E.T. v. Abbott, No. 1:21-cv-717 (W.D. Tex., filed August 17, 2021)

Complaint

AT v. Abbott complaint

Motion for TRO, with exhibits, August 18, 2021

AT v. Abbott TRO mo

Proposed scheduling order, with question about proper parties, September 1, 2021

25501323-0–92241

Scheduling order, September 3, 2021

25512466-0–93559

Defendants’ memo re proper parties, September 3, 2021

25513378-0–93676

Plaintiffs’ memo re proper parties, September 7, 2021

Pltf resp proper parties

Plaintiffs’ supplemental TRO memo, September 8, 2021

Pltf TRO mo supp

Scheduling order, for TRO hearing on 9/15, September 9, 2021

Scheduling order 9 9

State’s motion to dismiss, September 13, 2021

AT Texas motion to dismiss 9 13

State’s opposition to TRO, September 13, 2021

merged_31162_-1-1631626515

Plaintiffs’ reply supporting TRO, September 14, 2021

merged_32163_-1-1631712952

Order denying TRO, September 15, 2021

25560949-0–83416

[]

US statement of interest, September 29, 2021

DOJ-DISIBILITYRIGHTS SUIT

AT US statement of interest 9 29 21

Texas Pediatric Society amicus, September 29, 2021

25640064-0–18648

Texas trial brief, September 29, 2021

AT Texas trial brief 9 29

Plaintiffs’ trial brief, September 29, 2021

AT pltf trial brief 9 29

Texas response to plaintiffs’ trial brief, October 5, 2021

AT def trial brief response

Plaintiffs’ response to Texas trial brief, October 5, 2021

AT pltf trial brief resp

COPAA amicus, October 5, 2021

AT COPAA amicus

Memorandum opinion and permanent injunction, November 10, 2021

E.T. memorandum opinion 11 10

E.T. permanent injunction order 11 10

Notice of appeal, November 11, 2021

TX notice of appeal

Motion for stay pending appeal, November 11, 2021

merged_22293_-1-1636925158

Order requesting response to motion for stay, November 12, 2021

RQ response order 11 12

Fifth Circuit # 21-51083

Plaintiffs’ opposition to stay, November 16, 2021

merged_88442_-1-1637442870

Texas’s notice of not filing reply to support stay, November 17, 2021

TX notice of not filing reply stay

Texas emergency motion for stay, and exhibits, November 23, 2021

5C TX emergency stay mo 11 23

5C TX emergency stay xh 11 23

Order for temporary administrative stay, November 24, 2021

5C order for temp admin stay 11 24

Plaintiffs’ response, November 24, 2021

5C pltf emergency stay response

Texas reply supporting stay, November 26, 2021

5C TX reply 11 26

Fifth Circuit stay order, December 1, 2021

5C E.T. order 12 1

======

The Tennessee schools mask mandate case

G.S. v. Lee, No. 2:21-cv-2552 (W.D. Tenn.)

Complaint, August 27, 2021

GS complaint

Motion for TRO, August 27, 2021

GS TRO mo

TRO, September 3, 2021

GS TRO 9 3

American Academy of Pediatrics amicus, September 7, 2021

GS Am Acad Pediatrics amicus

State’s opposition to TRO/PI, September 8, 2021

GS State TRO op

Plaintiffs’ response supporting preliminary injunction, September 10, 2021

GS pltf pi reply

State’s opposition to class certification, September 13, 2021

GS State PI op

Shelby County responses re preliminary injunction, class certification, September 13, 2021

GS Shelby Co pi resp

GS Shelby Co class cert response

Jordan Carpenter amicus, September 13, 2021

GS Carpenter amicus

Peggy June Griffin motion to intervene and dismiss, September 16, 2021

GS Griffin mo interv dism

Preliminary injunction, September 17, 2021

4239203-0–101567

State’s Answer, September 23, 2021

4244095-0–113985

Shelby County answer, September 23, 2021

4244198-0–113910

[]

Order denying motion to stay, October 22, 2021

=====

The Iowa schools mask mandate case

The ARC of Iowa v. Reynolds, No. 4:21-cv-264 (S.D. Iowa)

Complaint, September 3, 2021

ARC of Iowa complaint

Motion for TRO, including exhibits, September 3, 2021

ARC of Iowa TRO mo

Plaintiffs’ additional authority (Tennessee TRO), September 4, 2021

ARC of Iowa addl auth TN TRO

Motion for TRO, September 9, 2021

ARC of Iowa TRO mo 9 9

Defendants’ resistance, September 9, 2021

ARC of Iowa def resistance

Minute entry, September 10, 2021

ARC of Iowa minute entry 9 10

Plaintiffs’ declarations, September 10, 2021

ARC of Iowa declarations 9 10

Temporary restraining order, September 13, 2021

3293425-0–21938